These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3519996)
41. The subperiosteal implant denture program at the University of Southern California. Part VI. Mandibular implant denture technique. Bodine RL; Jones SD; Yanase RT; Travis CP J Oral Implantol; 1981; 9(3):387-411. PubMed ID: 6942176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A surgical guide for dental implant placement in edentulous posterior regions. Atsu SS J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16911890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Restoration of the atrophic, edentulous mandible. Tatum H; Lebowitz M; Borgner R J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 7869415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The mandibular full subperiosteal implant--clinical review of 100 cases. Golec TS Dent Surv; 1980 Apr; 56(4):32-8. PubMed ID: 6933124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Oral implantology. The International Team for Oral Implantatology (ITI)]. Schroeder A; Maeglin B; Schilli W; Ledermann PD Swiss Dent; 1982; 3(1-2):6-14, 16-8. PubMed ID: 6810510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The mandibular full subperiosteal implant. Consideration of the technique. Wilson R Br Dent J; 1982 Oct; 153(7):267-71. PubMed ID: 6958295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The Core-Vent implant: an alternative treatment for the edentulous mandible. Misch CE J Mich Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 66(6):219-23. PubMed ID: 6381736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Ramus frame configuration best suited for severely atrophied mandibles. Homoly P Dentist; 1988 Sep; 66(5):36. PubMed ID: 3229174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The subperiosteal implant denture program at the University of Southern California. Part I, introduction and implant denture removal. Bodine RL; Sullivan DY; Lund DF; Vakay LR; Yanase RT Oral Implantol; 1977; 6(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 268561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Indications and technic for the ramus frame implant (R.F.I.)]. Fumex JP; Avayou M Chir Dent Fr; 1989 Jan; 59(457):29-33. PubMed ID: 2598692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Application of interim fixed reference points to maintain the occlusal vertical dimension: a technique for immediate loading protocols in the edentulous mandible. Holst S; Blatz MB; Bergler M; Wichmann M J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 16911891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The atrophied mandible. A challenge for dentists. Beck PM Oral Health; 1985 Nov; 75(11):21-4. PubMed ID: 3868752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A preliminary study of 37 subperiosteal implant candidates with atrophic mandibles. Bustillo F; Kosinski T; Bachtell R J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 3458928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The two-phase implantation method using IMZ intramobile cylinder implants. Kirsch A J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 6368849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Immediate function in the edentulous mandible: replacement of a lost implant using prefabricated guides. Simamoto PC; Davi LR; Gomes VL; de Arruda Nobilo MA; Neves FD J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 16473091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Subperiosteal and mandibular bone plate implants: a comparison and presentation of criteria as used. Allen WL; Evans HR Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 6593291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]