These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35200541)

  • 1. The Pathway for New Cancer Drug Access in Canada.
    Gotfrit J; Dempster W; Chambers J; Wheatley-Price P
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Jan; 29(2):455-464. PubMed ID: 35200541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategizing health technology assessment for containment of cancer drug costs in a universal health care system: Case of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
    Niraula S
    Cancer; 2019 Sep; 125(18):3100-3103. PubMed ID: 31154671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. New rules and new status.
    Shulman SR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1994; 6 Suppl 1():71-9. PubMed ID: 10155589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Time-Trend Economic Analysis of Cancer Drug Trials.
    Cressman S; Browman GP; Hoch JS; Kovacic L; Peacock SJ
    Oncologist; 2015 Jul; 20(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 26032135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.
    Gotfrit J; Jackson A; Shin JJW; Stewart DJ; Mallick R; Wheatley-Price P
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 35323362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.
    Gotfrit J; Shin JJW; Mallick R; Stewart DJ; Wheatley-Price P
    Oncologist; 2020 Jan; 25(1):e130-e137. PubMed ID: 31506392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of drug reimbursement in Canada: the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance for new drugs.
    Husereau D; Dempster W; Blanchard A; Chambers J
    Value Health; 2014 Dec; 17(8):888-94. PubMed ID: 25498784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not All Canadian Cancer Patients Are Equal-Disparities in Public Cancer Drug Funding across Canada.
    MacPhail C; Snow S
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):2064-2072. PubMed ID: 35323366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pharmaceutical policies in Canada: another example of federal-provincial discord.
    Anis AH
    CMAJ; 2000 Feb; 162(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 10701389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration.
    Chan K; Nam S; Evans B; de Oliveira C; Chambers A; Gavura S; Hoch J; Mercer RE; Dai WF; Beca J; Tadrous M; Isaranuwatchai W
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e032884. PubMed ID: 31915169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New Cancer Drug Approvals From the Perspective of a Universal Healthcare System: Analyses of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Recommendations.
    Niraula S; Nugent Z
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Dec; 16(12):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 30545993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Pharmaceutical Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) Recommendations Amongst the Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), Public and Private Payers.
    Foroutan N; Tarride JE; Xie F; Mills F; Levine M
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2019 Dec; 3(4):437-451. PubMed ID: 31041614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models.
    Glennie J; Villalba E; Wheatley-Price P
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):981-988. PubMed ID: 35200582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evaluation and use of economic evidence to inform cancer drug reimbursement decisions in Canada.
    Yong JH; Beca J; Hoch JS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 23322588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activities of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance: An Observational Analysis.
    Rocchi A; Mills F
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Aug; 25(2):e12-e22. PubMed ID: 30725539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.
    Drummond M; de Pouvourville G; Jones E; Haig J; Saba G; Cawston H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 May; 32(5):509-20. PubMed ID: 24599784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada.
    Marshall DA; Douglas PR; Drummond MF; Torrance GW; Macleod S; Manti O; Cheruvu L; Corvari R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(6):477-95. PubMed ID: 18489199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value assessment in oncology drugs: funding of drugs for metastatic breast cancer in Canada.
    Lemieux J; Audet S
    Curr Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(Suppl 1):S161-S170. PubMed ID: 29910659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
    Raymakers AJN; Regier DA; Peacock SJ
    Cancer; 2020 Jan; 126(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 31544234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of antiretroviral drug costs in Brazil in the context of free and universal access to AIDS treatment.
    Nunn AS; Fonseca EM; Bastos FI; Gruskin S; Salomon JA
    PLoS Med; 2007 Nov; 4(11):e305. PubMed ID: 18001145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.