242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35200592)
21. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
Melamed A; Ramirez PT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach.
Salvo G; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Sep; 75():113-122. PubMed ID: 33888410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer.
Chen S; Zheng Y; Tong L; Zhao X; Chen L; Wang Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1471-1472. PubMed ID: 31926301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Song YL; Li RZ; Feng BJ; Lu YH; Wang LF; Wang ZY; Pei KG; Sun LF; Li R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108240. PubMed ID: 38457858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Yuan P; Liu Z; Qi J; Yang X; Hu T; Tan H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 30802608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancer.
Coronado PJ; Gracia M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 92():102434. PubMed ID: 38134716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revisiting Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Pennington KP; Urban RR; Gray HJ
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jan; 17(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 30659132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.
Matsuo K; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Ciesielski KM; Matsushima K; Matsuzaki S; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33992450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.
Park SJ; Kong TW; Kim T; Lee M; Choi CH; Shim SH; Yim GW; Lee S; Lee EJ; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Song T; Lee YY; Kim HS; Nam EJ
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):331. PubMed ID: 35346103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
