These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35201537)

  • 1. Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.
    Garofalo G; Gawryszewski LL; Riggio L
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):269-283. PubMed ID: 35201537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30187398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking time to take perspective? Rapidly changing reference frames in the avatar-Simon task.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103005. PubMed ID: 32058077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reversed effect of spatial compatibility when taking avatar's perspective.
    Müsseler J; Ruhland L; Böffel C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 30134768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Object affordances from the perspective of an avatar.
    Arend MG; Müsseler J
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Jul; 92():103133. PubMed ID: 33971501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial-numerical associations in the presence of an avatar.
    Böffel C; Herbst C; Lindemann O; Müsseler J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Oct; 85(7):2588-2598. PubMed ID: 33026539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 32529527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing the world through the eyes of an avatar? Comparing perspective taking and referential coding.
    von Salm-Hoogstraeten S; Bolzius K; Müsseler J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):264-273. PubMed ID: 32077741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action effect consistency and body ownership in the avatar-Simon task.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220817. PubMed ID: 31398233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived Ownership of Avatars Influences Visual Perspective Taking.
    Böffel C; Müsseler J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():743. PubMed ID: 29887816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of body direction and posture on taking the perspective of a humanoid avatar in a virtual environment.
    Ueda S; Nagamachi K; Nakamura J; Sugimoto M; Inami M; Kitazaki M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261063. PubMed ID: 34932598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others?
    Cole GG; Atkinson M; Le AT; Smith DT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():165-8. PubMed ID: 26826864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategy modulates spatial perspective-taking: evidence for dissociable disembodied and embodied routes.
    Gardner MR; Brazier M; Edmonds CJ; Gronholm PC
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():457. PubMed ID: 23964229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritization of self-relevant perspectives in ageing.
    Mattan BD; Quinn KA; Acaster SL; Jennings RM; Rotshtein P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jun; 70(6):1033-1052. PubMed ID: 26652616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.
    Muto H; Matsushita S; Morikawa K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):337-355. PubMed ID: 28795837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is effector visibility critical for performance asymmetries in the Simon task? Evidence from hand- and foot-press responses.
    Chen J; Seibold JC; Zhong Q; Müsseler J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):463-474. PubMed ID: 33251561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human Cognition in Interaction With Robots: Taking the Robot's Perspective Into Account.
    Salm-Hoogstraeten SV; Müsseler J
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1396-1407. PubMed ID: 32648797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 19041085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.