These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 352021)
1. [Stability of impression trays]. Schwickerath H ZWR; 1978 Jun; 87(12):596-8. PubMed ID: 352021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation. Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study. Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]