BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35204322)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Abbreviated Bi-Parametric MRI (a-bpMRI) for Prostate Cancer Detection and Screening: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Brembilla G; Giganti F; Sidhu H; Imbriaco M; Mallett S; Stabile A; Freeman A; Ahmed HU; Moore C; Emberton M; Punwani S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
    Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group.
    Cho J; Ahn H; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Choe G; Byun SS; Hong SK
    Prostate Int; 2020 Dec; 8(4):146-151. PubMed ID: 33425791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.
    Knaapila J; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Verho J; Perez IM; Kiviniemi A; Pahikkala T; Merisaari H; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 May; 7(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32418878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial.
    Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Månsson M; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Arnsrud Godtman R; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8692-8702. PubMed ID: 33890152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis.
    Feng X; Chen X; Peng P; Zhou H; Hong Y; Zhu C; Lu L; Xie S; Zhang S; Long L
    BMC Urol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):40. PubMed ID: 38365673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
    Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI.
    Song J; Zhao C; Zhang F; Yuan Y; Wang LM; Sah V; Zhang J; Weng W; Yang Z; Wang Z; Wang L
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):704-712. PubMed ID: 36464756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. bpMRI and mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Pan Y; Shen C; Chen X; Cao D; Jiang J; Xu W; Ji C; Pan X; Zheng B
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():1096387. PubMed ID: 36726941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biparametric prostate MRI: impact of a deep learning-based software and of quantitative ADC values on the inter-reader agreement of experienced and inexperienced readers.
    Cipollari S; Pecoraro M; Forookhi A; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Messina E; Lucciola S; Catalano C; Panebianco V
    Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 36114928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
    Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.
    Pesapane F; Acquasanta M; Meo RD; Agazzi GM; Tantrige P; Codari M; Schiaffino S; Patella F; Esseridou A; Sardanelli F
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic value of integrated
    Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
    Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
    Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
    Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alabousi M; Salameh JP; Gusenbauer K; Samoilov L; Jafri A; Yu H; Alabousi A
    BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30929292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol.
    Asif A; Nathan A; Ng A; Khetrapal P; Chan VW; Giganti F; Allen C; Freeman A; Punwani S; Lorgelly P; Clarke CS; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Emberton M; Agarwal R; Takwoingi Y; Deeks JJ; Moore CM; Kasivisvanathan V;
    BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e070280. PubMed ID: 37019486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.