203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35204322)
41. Prebiopsy biparametric MRI: differences of PI-RADS version 2 in patients with different PSA levels.
Choi MH; Lee YJ; Jung SE; Rha SE; Byun JY
Clin Radiol; 2018 Sep; 73(9):810-817. PubMed ID: 29895386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Boxler S; Kuru TH; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Steinemann S; Huettenbrink C; Bergstraesser-Gasch C; Klein T; Kesch C; Roethke M; Becker N; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Sep; 18(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial.
Jambor I; Verho J; Ettala O; Knaapila J; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Kiviniemi A; Kähkönen E; Perez IM; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Oksanen O; Riikonen J; Vimpeli SM; Kauko T; Merisaari H; Kallajoki M; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ
PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002813. PubMed ID: 31158230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.
Chen T; Zhang Z; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Wang S; Zhao W; Qian X; Zhou Z; Shen J; Dai Y; Hu J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():792456. PubMed ID: 35127499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer.
Greenberg JW; Koller CR; Casado C; Triche BL; Krane LS
Ther Adv Urol; 2022; 14():17562872221096377. PubMed ID: 35531364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Usefulness of Bi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging with b=1,800 s/mm² Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Lee SS; Lee DH; Song WH; Nam JK; Han JY; Lee HJ; Kim TU; Park SW
World J Mens Health; 2020 Jul; 38(3):370-376. PubMed ID: 31385479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.
Knaapila J; Autio V; Jambor I; Ettala O; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Taimen P; Perez IM; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
Scand J Urol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 31914846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Abbreviated Versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Active Surveillance for Prostate-Cancer Patients: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Utility as a Decisional Tool.
Zattoni F; Maresca S; Dal Moro F; Bednarova I; Randazzo G; Basso G; Reitano G; Giannarini G; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study.
Falagario U; Jambor I; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Kähkönen E; Merisaari H; Montoya Perez I; Knaapila J; Steiner A; Verho J; Tewari A; Aronen HJ; Carrieri G; Boström PJ; Ettala O
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 32778912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How Fast Can We Go: Abbreviated Prostate MR Protocols.
Udayakumar N; Porter KK
Curr Urol Rep; 2020 Nov; 21(12):59. PubMed ID: 33135121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging assessment for detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ye L; Chen Y; Xu H; Xie H; Yao J; Liu J; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6480-6492. PubMed ID: 35362750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Clinical impact of abbreviated unenhanced prostate protocols in magnetic resonance imaging].
Solyanik O; Heimer M
Radiologe; 2021 Sep; 61(9):810-817. PubMed ID: 34297140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of risk-calculator and MRI and consecutive pathways as upfront stratification for prostate biopsy.
Reesink DJ; Schilham MGM; van der Hoeven EJRJ; Schoots IG; van Melick HHE; van den Bergh RCN
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2453-2461. PubMed ID: 33090259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Biparametric
Scialpi M; Prosperi E; D'Andrea A; Martorana E; Malaspina C; Palumbo B; Orlandi A; Falcone G; Milizia M; Mearini L; Aisa MC; Scialpi P; DE Dominicis C; Bianchi G; Sidoni A
Anticancer Res; 2017 Mar; 37(3):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 28314291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial): Sensitivity for prostate cancer detection in correlation with whole-mount prostatectomy sections and implications for focal therapy.
Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Boström PJ; Montoya Perez I; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Syvänen K; Kähkönen E; Eklund L; Pahikkala T; Vainio P; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Taimen P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30903647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kato D; Ozawa K; Takeuchi S; Kawase M; Kawase K; Nakai C; Takai M; Iinuma K; Nakane K; Kato H; Matsuo M; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Koie T
Curr Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(2):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 33809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
