178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35204629)
21. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
Meng Z; Chen C; Zhu Y; Zhang S; Wei C; Hu B; Yu L; Hu B; Shen E
Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3638-47. PubMed ID: 25916389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS): initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Hille U; Wiskirchen J; Gyapong S; Soliman AA; Degenhardt F; Hillemanns P
Int J Womens Health; 2011; 3():337-46. PubMed ID: 22114526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS).
Wojcinski S; Gyapong S; Farrokh A; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 13():36. PubMed ID: 24219312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast.
Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Fu N; Huang P; Yang B
BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():798. PubMed ID: 25366878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Application of automated breast volume scanner and mammography in differentiation of small breast lesions with BI-RADS-US 4].
Wen H; Xiao J; Zhou Y; He F; Mao Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1131-1136. PubMed ID: 30523235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical Application Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanner in the Diagnosis of Abdominal External Hernia.
Ni X; Yang Y; Liu Z; Yu F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 May; 45(5):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 30827707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps.
Ibraheem SA; Mahmud R; Mohamad Saini S; Abu Hassan H; Keiteb AS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner.
Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Compared with Handheld Ultrasound in Pre-Operative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinomas: A Pilot Study of 51 Cases.
Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Yang B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 27339762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).
Chen H; Han M; Jing H; Liu Z; Shang H; Wang Q; Cheng W
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34880658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
