158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35204643)
21. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT).
Maccioni F; Marcelli G; Al Ansari N; Zippi M; De Marco V; Kagarmanova A; Vestri A; Marcheggiano-Clarke L; Marini M
Clin Ter; 2010; 161(2):e57-62. PubMed ID: 20499021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography roles in thymic lesion treatment planning.
Travaini LL; Petralia G; Trifirò G; Ravasi L; Galetta D; Carbone G; Falcini F; Spaggiari L; Bellomi M; Paganelli G
Lung Cancer; 2008 Sep; 61(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 18358558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterisation of focal liver lesions undetermined at grey-scale US: contrast-enhanced US versus 64-row MDCT and MRI with liver-specific contrast agent.
Bartolotta TV; Taibbi A; Midiri M; La Grutta L; De Maria M; Lagalla R
Radiol Med; 2010 Aug; 115(5):714-31. PubMed ID: 20082225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Ampullary Lesions Causing Distal Common Bile Duct Obstruction.
Pongpornsup S; Pawananunt P; Teerasamit W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Aug; 99(8):940-8. PubMed ID: 29949105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Real-time ultrasonography-computed tomography fusion imaging for staging of hepatic metastatic involvement in patients with colorectal cancer: initial results from comparison to US seeing separate CT images and to multidetector-row CT alone.
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; Seydewitz C; Keuchel M; Pohland C; Dahlke J; Weilert H; Wessling J; Malzfeldt E
Invest Radiol; 2010 Aug; 45(8):491-501. PubMed ID: 20458251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Role of CT Imaging in Characterization of Small Renal Masses.
Bazzocchi MV; Zilioli C; Gallone VI; Commisso C; Bertolotti L; Pagnini F; Ziglioli F; Maestroni U; Aliprandi A; Buti S; Procopio G; Ascenti G; Martini C; De Filippo M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36766439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand-crafted feature concatenation.
Lee H; Hong H; Kim J; Jung DC
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29474742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention.
Menogue SR; O'Brien BA; Brown AL; Cohen RJ
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4 Pt B):E146-51. PubMed ID: 22805186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.
Marano R; Storto ML; Maddestra N; Bonomo L
Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1353-62. PubMed ID: 15103498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of incidental liver lesions: comparison of multidetector CT versus Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging.
Chung YE; Kim MJ; Kim YE; Park MS; Choi JY; Kim KW
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66141. PubMed ID: 23776623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predicting common solid renal tumors using machine learning models of classification of radiologist-assessed magnetic resonance characteristics.
Lopes Vendrami C; McCarthy RJ; Villavicencio CP; Miller FH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Sep; 45(9):2797-2809. PubMed ID: 32666233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination.
Kim EY; Park BK; Kim CK; Lee HM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1143-8. PubMed ID: 20849320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation of Upper Urinary Tract Lesions Using MDCT: Benign Vs Malignant.
Kemėšienė J; Sebastia C; Paño B; Ribal MJ; Rodriguez-Carunchio L; Nicolau C
Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1564-1571. PubMed ID: 31901315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Active surveillance of small renal masses.
Sebastià C; Corominas D; Musquera M; Paño B; Ajami T; Nicolau C
Insights Imaging; 2020 May; 11(1):63. PubMed ID: 32372194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Relative accuracy of CT and MRI in the differentiation of benign from malignant pancreatic cystic lesions.
Lee HJ; Kim MJ; Choi JY; Hong HS; Kim KA
Clin Radiol; 2011 Apr; 66(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 21356393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single-Acquisition Triple-Bolus Dual-Energy CT Protocol for Comprehensive Evaluation of Renal Masses: A Single-Center Randomized Noninferiority Trial.
Manoharan D; Sharma S; Das CJ; Kumar R; Singh G; Kumar P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W22-W32. PubMed ID: 29792728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT?
Millet I; Doyon FC; Hoa D; Thuret R; Merigeaud S; Serre I; Taourel P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):887-96. PubMed ID: 21940576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Growth kinetics of small renal masses: A prospective analysis from the Renal Cell Carcinoma Consortium of Canada.
Organ M; Jewett M; Basiuk J; Morash C; Pautler S; Siemens DR; Tanguay S; Gleave M; Drachenberg D; Chow R; Chin J; Evans A; Fleshner N; Gallie B; Haider M; Kachura J; Finelli A; Rendon RA
Can Urol Assoc J; 2014; 8(1-2):24-7. PubMed ID: 24578738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of 64 sliced multi-detector computed tomography in diagnosis of small bowel obstruction.
Pongpornsup S; Tarachat K; Srisajjakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92(12):1651-61. PubMed ID: 20043569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
