These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35206217)

  • 1. Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
    Albanchez-González MI; Brinkmann JC; Peláez-Rico J; López-Suárez C; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Suárez-García MJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review.
    Rutkūnas V; Gečiauskaitė A; Jegelevičius D; Vaitiekūnas M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10 Suppl 1():101-120. PubMed ID: 28944372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review.
    Schmidt A; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jun; 33(6):573-585. PubMed ID: 35527511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Digital Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
    Giachetti L; Sarti C; Cinelli F; Russo DS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 32069344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Chen YW; Kotina E; Natto Z; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):660-678. PubMed ID: 32613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review.
    Alikhasi M; Alsharbaty MHM; Moharrami M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 26(6):929-935. PubMed ID: 29095786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques on implants: a review.
    Arcuri L; Lorenzi C; Vanni A; Bianchi N; Dolci A; Arcuri C
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(1 Suppl. 1):89-97. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT. PubMed ID: 32064840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: A systematic review.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Medeiros VR; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 33268069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key-based method.
    Schmidt A; Rein PE; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Apr; 32(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33469983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Adaskevicius R; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Nov; 28(4):173-181. PubMed ID: 32673469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision and practical usefulness of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry: A systematic literature review.
    García-Gil I; Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J; Jiménez-García J; Peláez-Rico J; Suárez-García MJ
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e784-e793. PubMed ID: 32913577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A systematic review.
    Wulfman C; Naveau A; Rignon-Bret C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 31757443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.