These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35207762)

  • 1. Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients' Preferences and Personalize Care.
    Al-Omari B; Farhat J; Ershaid M
    J Pers Med; 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35207762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
    Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Review of Studies Using Conjoint Analysis Techniques to Investigate Patients' Preferences Regarding Osteoarthritis Treatment.
    Al-Omari B; McMeekin P; Bate A
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2021; 15():197-211. PubMed ID: 33568897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.
    Bridges JF; Kinter ET; Kidane L; Heinzen RR; McCormick C
    Patient; 2008 Dec; 1(4):273-82. PubMed ID: 22272995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
    FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient preferences for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany.
    Hofheinz R; Clouth J; Borchardt-Wagner J; Wagner U; Weidling E; Jen MH; Brück P
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(1):937. PubMed ID: 27923357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
    Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
    Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjoint analysis: a novel, rigorous tool for determining patient preferences for topical antibiotic treatment for acne. A randomised controlled trial.
    Kellett N; West F; Finlay AY
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Mar; 154(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 16445786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fertility clinicians and infertile patients in China have different preferences in fertility care.
    Cai QF; Wan F; Dong XY; Liao XH; Zheng J; Wang R; Wang L; Ji LC; Zhang HW
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 24549214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.
    Marshall D; Bridges JF; Hauber B; Cameron R; Donnalley L; Fyie K; Johnson FR
    Patient; 2010 Dec; 3(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 22273432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients' preferences for healthcare system reforms in Hungary: a conjoint analysis.
    Akkazieva B; Gulacsi L; Brandtmuller A; Péntek M; Bridges JF
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2006; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 17132033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publishing in pandemic times: A bibliometric analysis of early medical publications on Kawasaki-like disease (MIS-C, PIMS-TS) related to SARS-CoV-2.
    Morand A; Urbina D; Giovannini-Chami L; Fabre A
    Arch Pediatr; 2021 Aug; 28(6):464-469. PubMed ID: 34140220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation--a review of methods and applications.
    Alriksson S; Oberg T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):244-57. PubMed ID: 18504844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Rating Scale, Time Tradeoff, and Conjoint Analysis Methods for Assessment of Preferences in Prostate Cancer.
    Kaplan RM; Crespi CM; Dahan E; Saucedo JD; Pagan C; Saigal CS
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):816-826. PubMed ID: 31556793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.