173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35208601)
1. A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
Shankar P; Chellathurai BNK; Kumar SA; Mahendra J; Mugri MH; Sayed M; Almagbol M; Al Wadei MHD; Vijayalakshmi R; Ambalavanan N; Raj AT; Patil S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Feb; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 35208601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.
Oliveira ACA; Amorim KS; Nascimento Júnior EMD; Duarte ACB; Groppo FC; Takeshita WM; Souza LMA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180195. PubMed ID: 30673030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative assessment of efficacy and preference between needleless device INJEX and insulin syringe for anesthetizing primary maxillary teeth in children aged 4-9 years: A split-mouth crossover randomized clinical study.
Patel M; Bhatt R; Mehta M; Patel C; Patel F; Makwani D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2023; 41(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 37635474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relief of Injection Pain During Delivery of Local Anesthesia by Computer-Controlled Anesthetic Delivery System for Periodontal Surgery: Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial.
Chang H; Noh J; Lee J; Kim S; Koo KT; Kim TI; Seol YJ; Lee YM; Ku Y; Rhyu IC
J Periodontol; 2016 Jul; 87(7):783-9. PubMed ID: 26991489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.
Campanella V; Libonati A; Nardi R; Angotti V; Gallusi G; Montemurro E; D'Amario M; Marzo G
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3205-3213. PubMed ID: 29525923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.
Arapostathis KN; Dabarakis NN; Coolidge T; Tsirlis A; Kotsanos N
Anesth Prog; 2010; 57(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 20331333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subcutaneous administration of midazolam: a comparison of the Bioject jet injector with the conventional syringe and needle.
Bennett J; Nichols F; Rosenblum M; Condry J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 56(11):1249-54. PubMed ID: 9820211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy.
Gupta R; Kaur S; Dahiya P; Kumar M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2018; 8(2):118-121. PubMed ID: 29892533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the jet injection effective for teeth extraction?
Ocak H; Akkoyun EF; Çolpak HA; Demetoğlu U; Yücesoy T; Kılıç E; Alkan A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31077857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Jet or conventional local anaesthesia? A randomized controlled split mouth study.
Theocharidou A; Arhakis A; Kotsanos N; Arapostathis K
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6813-6819. PubMed ID: 33912990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The needleless syringe: efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference in child dental patients.
Saravia ME; Bush JP
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1991; 15(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 1931745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Needle-free jet versus conventional needle injection for local anesthesia in men undergoing surgical sperm retrieval.
Khoa LD; Quang TN; Toan PD; Loc NMT; Diem NTN; Dang VQ; Vu HNA; Mol BW; Handelsman DJ
Andrology; 2019 Jan; 7(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30407744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-controlled delivery versus syringe delivery of local anesthetic injections for therapeutic scaling and root planing.
Loomer PM; Perry DA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Mar; 135(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 15058627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial".
Berrendero S; Hriptulova O; Salido MP; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2307-2315. PubMed ID: 32862249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New horizons in local anesthesia.
Lackey AD
Dent Today; 1998 Aug; 17(8):78-9. PubMed ID: 10752412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The feasibility of needleless jet injection versus conventional needle local anesthesia during dental procedures: a systematic review.
Alameeri AA; AlShamsi HA; Murad A; Alhammadi MM; Alketbi MH; AlHamwi A; Rawi NHA; Kawas SA; Mohammed MM; Shetty SR
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 36579904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures.
Langthasa M; Yeluri R; Jain AA; Munshi AK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 23514685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local anesthesia by jet-injection device in minor dermatologic surgery.
Queralt CB; Comet V; Cruz JM; Val-Carreres C
Dermatol Surg; 1995 Jul; 21(7):649-51. PubMed ID: 7606381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Needle-less local anesthesia: clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the jet anesthesia Injex in local anesthesia in dentistry.
Dabarakis NN; Alexander V; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Nikolaos M
Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(10):E572-6. PubMed ID: 18197315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of periodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe.
Smith GN; Walton RE; Abbott BJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Dec; 107(6):953-6. PubMed ID: 6581222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
