175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35208601)
41. No-needle jet anesthetic technique for no-scalpel vasectomy.
Weiss RS; Li PS
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1677-80. PubMed ID: 15821547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of dental jet injection syringes.
Pollack BF; Crasson W; Milling L
N Y State Dent J; 1971 Dec; 37(10):618-21. PubMed ID: 5286911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.
Belevcikli M; Altan H; Demir O
J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2023 Feb; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 36819599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Jet injection needle-free dental anaesthesia: Initial findings.
Brunton PA; McLean M; Vedagiri S; McKeage J; Ruddy B; Weatherly K; White D; Taberner A; Loch C
J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104165. PubMed ID: 35580835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Spanos S; Booth R; Koenig H; Sikes K; Gracely E; Kim IK
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Aug; 24(8):511-5. PubMed ID: 18645542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Clinical evaluation of the INJEX system, a local anesthesia system without needles: a comfort evaluation study].
Geenen L; Marks LA; Martens LC
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2004; 59(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15526641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Flisfisch S; Woelber JP; Walther W
Heliyon; 2021 Feb; 7(2):e06012. PubMed ID: 33604465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Anterior middle superior alveolar injection is effective in providing anesthesia extending to the last standing molar in maxillary periodontal surgery.
Acharya AB; Banakar C; Rodrigues SV; Nagpal S; Bhadbhade S; Thakur SL
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1174-9. PubMed ID: 20450369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.
Kämmerer PW; Adubae A; Buttchereit I; Thiem DGE; Daubländer M; Frerich B
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1469-1475. PubMed ID: 29034443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Subjective pain response to two anesthetic systems in dental surgery: traditional syringe vs. a computer controlled delivery system.
Patini R; Coviello V; Raffaelli L; Manicone PF; Dehkhargani SZ; Verdugo F; Perfetti G; D'Addona A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(2 Suppl):89-97. PubMed ID: 23164333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of Automatically Controlled Injection System with a Traditional. Syringe for Multiple Infiltrations in Children Aged 6-12 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Beegum F; Monier E; Elshaboury SN; Alghofaili AI; Habibullah MA; Karthika S
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1535-S1538. PubMed ID: 38882898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery - A split mouth randomized clinical trial.
Tirumalasetty SSM; Chinniswami Doraisami D; Konathala SVR; Penmetsa SG; Gottumukkala NVSSS
Eur Oral Res; 2021 Sep; 55(3):139-145. PubMed ID: 34746785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pain perception during inferior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe.
Yesilyurt C; Bulut G; Taşdemir T
Br Dent J; 2008 Sep; 205(5):E10; discussion 258-9. PubMed ID: 18791585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lamberton JA; Oesterle LJ; Shellhart WC; Newman SM; Harrell RE; Tilliss T; Singh N; Carey CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26718373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Patient and dentist satisfaction with a computerized local anesthetic injection system.
Grace EG; Barnes DM; Macek MD; Tatum N
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):746-8, 750, 752. PubMed ID: 11199649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation.
True RH; Fabfp ; Abhrs ; Elliott RM; Abhrs
Dermatol Surg; 2002 Jun; 28(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 12081672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Pain and anxiety reduction using a manual stimulation distraction device when administering local analgesia oro-dental injections: a multi-center clinical investigation.
Touyz LZ; Lamontagne P; Smith BE
J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):88-92. PubMed ID: 15688965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Efficacy trial of Camouflage Syringe to reduce dental fear and anxiety.
Ujaoney S; Mamtani M; Thakre T; Tote J; Hazarey V; Hazarey P; Kulkarni H
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 24313577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The WAND local anesthetic delivery system: a more pleasant experience for anal anesthesia.
Tan PY; Vukasin P; Chin ID; Ciona CJ; Ortega AE; Anthone GJ; Corman ML; Beart RW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 May; 44(5):686-9. PubMed ID: 11376545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of intra-pocket anesthesia gel on treatment outcome in periodontal patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Derman SH; Lowden CE; Hellmich M; Noack MJ
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 May; 41(5):481-8. PubMed ID: 24628437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
