288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35210964)
1. Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample.
Goldberg J; Boyce LM; Soudant C; Godwin K
J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jan; 110(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 35210964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study.
Rehlicki D; Plenkovic M; Delac L; Pieper D; Marušić A; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111218. PubMed ID: 37993073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study.
Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Tsujimoto Y; Luo Y; Yamamoto K; So R; Aga M; Matsushima K; Fukuma S; Furukawa TA
Br J Surg; 2021 Dec; 108(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 34791075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.
Giang HTN; Ahmed AM; Fala RY; Khattab MM; Othman MHA; Abdelrahman SAM; Thao LP; Gabl AEAE; Elrashedy SA; Lee PN; Hirayama K; Salem H; Huy NT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):164. PubMed ID: 31349805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the Completeness of Registration and Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Yoga for Health.
Bethel K; Faciszewski H; Ballis S; Sullivan M; Wieland LS
J Integr Complement Med; 2024 Apr; 30(4):336-344. PubMed ID: 37967461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann T; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():60-68. PubMed ID: 31740319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.
Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Innes NP
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):548-560. PubMed ID: 30070003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study.
Lu C; Lu T; Ge L; Yang N; Yan P; Yang K
Ann Transl Med; 2020 May; 8(10):652. PubMed ID: 32566589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.
Greenberg DR; Richardson MT; Tijerina JD; Bass MB; Eisenberg ML
J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 30773501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?
van der Pol CB; McInnes MD; Petrcich W; Tunis AS; Hanna R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119892. PubMed ID: 25775455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses.
Johnson BT; Hennessy EA
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jul; 233():237-251. PubMed ID: 31233957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
