127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35211186)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging for liver cirrhosis compared to histologically proven liver cirrhosis. A multicenter collaborative study.
Kudo M; Zheng RQ; Kim SR; Okabe Y; Osaki Y; Iijima H; Itani T; Kasugai H; Kanematsu M; Ito K; Usuki N; Shimamatsu K; Kage M; Kojiro M
Intervirology; 2008; 51 Suppl 1():17-26. PubMed ID: 18544944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural networks in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumours.
Clayton RD; Snowden S; Weston MJ; Mogensen O; Eastaugh J; Lane G
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Oct; 106(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 10519435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():96. PubMed ID: 20961457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Preliminary study on the diagnostic value of serum-derived exosomal lncRNA in epithelial ovarian cancer].
Li YW; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 57(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 35385957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Usefulness of diagnostic indices comprising clinical, sonographic, and biomarker data for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian masses.
Stukan M; Dudziak M; Ratajczak K; Grabowski JP
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Feb; 34(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 25614393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Deep learning-enabled pelvic ultrasound images for accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer in China: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.
Gao Y; Zeng S; Xu X; Li H; Yao S; Song K; Li X; Chen L; Tang J; Xing H; Yu Z; Zhang Q; Zeng S; Yi C; Xie H; Xiong X; Cai G; Wang Z; Wu Y; Chi J; Jiao X; Qin Y; Mao X; Chen Y; Jin X; Mo Q; Chen P; Huang Y; Shi Y; Wang J; Zhou Y; Ding S; Zhu S; Liu X; Dong X; Cheng L; Zhu L; Cheng H; Cha L; Hao Y; Jin C; Zhang L; Zhou P; Sun M; Xu Q; Chen K; Gao Z; Zhang X; Ma Y; Liu Y; Xiao L; Xu L; Peng L; Hao Z; Yang M; Wang Y; Ou H; Jia Y; Tian L; Zhang W; Jin P; Tian X; Huang L; Wang Z; Liu J; Fang T; Yan D; Cao H; Ma J; Li X; Zheng X; Lou H; Song C; Li R; Wang S; Li W; Zheng X; Chen J; Li G; Chen R; Xu C; Yu R; Wang J; Xu S; Kong B; Xie X; Ma D; Gao Q
Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Mar; 4(3):e179-e187. PubMed ID: 35216752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MRI characteristics for differentiating mucinous borderline ovarian tumours from mucinous ovarian cancers.
Yang XY; Li X; Ma FH; Li HM; Zhao SH; Li YA; Qiang JW
Clin Radiol; 2022 Feb; 77(2):142-147. PubMed ID: 34848025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Characteristics of ovarian tumors with color Doppler sonography: a comparison of predictive models derived from two academic centers data].
Smoleń A; Szpurek D; Czekierdowski A; Moszyński R
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 14674137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of Selected Models for Predicting Malignancy in Ovarian Tumors in Relation to the Degree of Diagnostic Uncertainty by Subjective Assessment With Ultrasound.
Szubert S; Szpurek D; Wójtowicz A; Żywica P; Stukan M; Sajdak S; Jabłonski S; Wicherek Ł; Moszyński R
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 31782548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ADNEX Model-Based Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer Using MRI Images.
Liu B; Liao J; Gu W; Wang J; Li G; Wang L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():2146578. PubMed ID: 34497480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Establishment and validation of a predictive nomogram model for advanced gastric cancer with perineural invasion].
Liu SH; Hou XY; Zhang XX; Liu GW; Xin FJ; Wang JG; Zhang DL; Wang DS; Lu Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 33212554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.
Kaijser J; Van Gorp T; Van Hoorde K; Van Holsbeke C; Sayasneh A; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 23360924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evolutionary algorithm-based classifier parameter tuning for automatic ovarian cancer tissue characterization and classification.
Acharya UR; Mookiah MR; Vinitha Sree S; Yanti R; Martis RJ; Saba L; Molinari F; Guerriero S; Suri JS
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Jun; 35(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 23258769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A radiomics approach for automated diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm malignancy in computed tomography.
Li S; Liu J; Xiong Y; Pang P; Lei P; Zou H; Zhang M; Fan B; Luo P
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8730. PubMed ID: 33888749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
