176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3521175)
1. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved endocervical cell yield with Cytobrush.
Deckert JJ; Staten SF; Palermo V
J Fam Pract; 1988 Jun; 26(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 3379366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
