These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35212386)

  • 1. Ligation-assisted homologous recombination enables precise genome editing by deploying both MMEJ and HDR.
    Zhao Z; Shang P; Sage F; Geijsen N
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jun; 50(11):e62. PubMed ID: 35212386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in
    Zhang WW; Matlashewski G
    mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.
    Xue C; Greene EC
    Trends Genet; 2021 Jul; 37(7):639-656. PubMed ID: 33896583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods Favoring Homology-Directed Repair Choice in Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Induced-Double Strand Breaks.
    Yang H; Ren S; Yu S; Pan H; Li T; Ge S; Zhang J; Xia N
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32899704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-Homologous End Joining and Homology Directed DNA Repair Frequency of Double-Stranded Breaks Introduced by Genome Editing Reagents.
    Zaboikin M; Zaboikina T; Freter C; Srinivasakumar N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169931. PubMed ID: 28095454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel Cas9 fusion protein promotes targeted genome editing with reduced mutational burden in primary human cells.
    Carusillo A; Haider S; Schäfer R; Rhiel M; Türk D; Chmielewski KO; Klermund J; Mosti L; Andrieux G; Schäfer R; Cornu TI; Cathomen T; Mussolino C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 May; 51(9):4660-4673. PubMed ID: 37070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precise and efficient nucleotide substitution near genomic nick via noncanonical homology-directed repair.
    Nakajima K; Zhou Y; Tomita A; Hirade Y; Gurumurthy CB; Nakada S
    Genome Res; 2018 Feb; 28(2):223-230. PubMed ID: 29273627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CRISPR/Cas-based precision genome editing via microhomology-mediated end joining.
    Van Vu T; Thi Hai Doan D; Kim J; Sung YW; Thi Tran M; Song YJ; Das S; Kim JY
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2021 Feb; 19(2):230-239. PubMed ID: 33047464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of HR and NHEJ activities via CRISPR/Cas9-induced oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated DSB repair.
    Du J; Yin N; Xie T; Zheng Y; Xia N; Shang J; Chen F; Zhang H; Yu J; Liu F
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Oct; 70():67-71. PubMed ID: 30212742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Modifications in Zebrafish.
    Kamachi Y; Kawahara A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():313-324. PubMed ID: 36773157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.
    Tatiossian KJ; Clark RDE; Huang C; Thornton ME; Grubbs BH; Cannon PM
    Mol Ther; 2021 Mar; 29(3):1057-1069. PubMed ID: 33160457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proximal binding of dCas9 at a DNA double strand break stimulates homology-directed repair as a local inhibitor of classical non-homologous end joining.
    Feng YL; Liu SC; Chen RD; Sun XN; Xiao JJ; Xiang JF; Xie AY
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Apr; 51(6):2740-2758. PubMed ID: 36864759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulating DNA Repair Pathways to Improve Precision Genome Engineering.
    Pawelczak KS; Gavande NS; VanderVere-Carozza PS; Turchi JJ
    ACS Chem Biol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 29210569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining.
    Maruyama T; Dougan SK; Truttmann MC; Bilate AM; Ingram JR; Ploegh HL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 May; 33(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 25798939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.
    Danner E; Bashir S; Yumlu S; Wurst W; Wefers B; Kühn R
    Mamm Genome; 2017 Aug; 28(7-8):262-274. PubMed ID: 28374058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exogenous gene integration mediated by genome editing technologies in zebrafish.
    Morita H; Taimatsu K; Yanagi K; Kawahara A
    Bioengineered; 2017 May; 8(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 28272984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opportunities and challenges with CRISPR-Cas mediated homologous recombination based precise editing in plants and animals.
    Singh S; Chaudhary R; Deshmukh R; Tiwari S
    Plant Mol Biol; 2023 Jan; 111(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 36315306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Choice of a Donor Molecule in Genome Editing Experiments in Animal Cells].
    Volodina OV; Smirnikhina SA
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2022; 56(3):428-438. PubMed ID: 35621098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancement of homology-directed repair with chromatin donor templates in cells.
    Cruz-Becerra G; Kadonaga JT
    Elife; 2020 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 32343230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
    Guo T; Feng YL; Xiao JJ; Liu Q; Sun XN; Xiang JF; Kong N; Liu SC; Chen GQ; Wang Y; Dong MM; Cai Z; Lin H; Cai XJ; Xie AY
    Genome Biol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 30340517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.