219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35212559)
1.
Yadav D; Hwang H; Qiao W; Upadhyay R; Chapin BF; Tang C; Aparicio A; Lopez-Olivo MA; Kang SK; Macapinlac HA; Bathala TK; Surasi DS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2022 Mar; 4(2):e210091. PubMed ID: 35212559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus
Tan N; Oyoyo U; Bavadian N; Ferguson N; Mukkamala A; Calais J; Davenport MS
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 32396045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Calais J; Ceci F; Eiber M; Hope TA; Hofman MS; Rischpler C; Bach-Gansmo T; Nanni C; Savir-Baruch B; Elashoff D; Grogan T; Dahlbom M; Slavik R; Gartmann J; Nguyen K; Lok V; Jadvar H; Kishan AU; Rettig MB; Reiter RE; Fendler WP; Czernin J
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 31375469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of
Kim SJ; Lee SW
Clin Radiol; 2019 Nov; 74(11):886-892. PubMed ID: 31358294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gossili F; Mogensen AW; Konnerup TC; Bouchelouche K; Alberts I; Afshar-Oromieh A; Zacho HD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Dec; 51(1):281-294. PubMed ID: 37597010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Evangelista L; Briganti A; Fanti S; Joniau S; Reske S; Schiavina R; Stief C; Thalmann GN; Picchio M
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 26850970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Diagnostic Role of
Wang R; Shen G; Huang M; Tian R
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():684629. PubMed ID: 34222008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of
Galgano SJ; McDonald AM; Rais-Bahrami S; Porter KK; Choudhary G; Burgan C; Bhambhvani P; Nix JW; Morgan DE; Li Y; Thomas JV; McConathy J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):720-729. PubMed ID: 33052718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of
Liu X; Wang Q; Zhang B; Jiang T; Zeng W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 35388806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Corfield J; Perera M; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):519-527. PubMed ID: 29344682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Selnæs KM; Krüger-Stokke B; Elschot M; Willoch F; Størkersen Ø; Sandsmark E; Moestue SA; Tessem MB; Halvorsen D; Kjøbli E; Angelsen A; Langørgen S; Bertilsson H; Bathen TF
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3151-3159. PubMed ID: 29294158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of
Ling SW; de Jong AC; Schoots IG; Nasserinejad K; Busstra MB; van der Veldt AAM; Brabander T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 33():61-71. PubMed ID: 34632423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
