These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35213040)
21. Biological-equivalent-dose-based integrated optimization framework for fast-energy-switching Bragg peak FLASH-RT using single-beam-per-fraction. Zeng Y; Li H; Zhang Q; Wang W; Liu X; Qin B; Pang B; Liu M; Yang K; Quan H; Chang Y; Yang Z Med Phys; 2024 Sep; 51(9):6292-6304. PubMed ID: 39031641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam. Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions. Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Definition of dose rate for FLASH pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: A comparative study. Deffet S; Hamaide V; Sterpin E Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5784-5792. PubMed ID: 37439504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. TriB-RT: Simultaneous optimization of photon, electron and proton beams. Kueng R; Mueller S; Loebner HA; Frei D; Volken W; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Fix MK; Manser P Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045006. PubMed ID: 32413883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans. Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Current delivery limitations of proton PBS for FLASH. Zou W; Diffenderfer ES; Cengel KA; Kim MM; Avery S; Konzer J; Cai Y; Boisseu P; Ota K; Yin L; Wiersma R; Carlson DJ; Fan Y; Busch TM; Koumenis C; Lin A; Metz JM; Teo BK; Dong L Radiother Oncol; 2021 Feb; 155():212-218. PubMed ID: 33186682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning. Folkerts MM; Abel E; Busold S; Perez JR; Krishnamurthi V; Ling CC Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6396-6404. PubMed ID: 32910460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT. Zeng Y; Zhang Q; Pang B; Liu M; Chang Y; Wang Y; Quan H; Yang Z Phys Med Biol; 2024 Sep; 69(19):. PubMed ID: 39214129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. From protons to Picasso: recreating famous paintings using proton beams as a "Paintbrush". Xu L Med Dosim; 2024 Spring; 49(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 37666706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Two-dimensional oxygen-diffusion modelling for FLASH proton therapy with pencil beam scanning-Impact of diffusive tissue properties, dose, dose rate and scan patterns. Diepeveen MH; Lathouwers D; José Santo R; Hoogeman MS; Habraken SJM Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jul; 69(15):. PubMed ID: 38959905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning. Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer. Rana S; Zheng Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intra-fractional per-beam adaptive workflow to mitigate the need for a rotating gantry during MRI-guided proton therapy. Guerreiro F; Svensson S; Seravalli E; Traneus E; Raaymakers BW Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(18):. PubMed ID: 34298523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A treatment planning study to assess the feasibility of laser-driven proton therapy using a compact gantry design. Hofmann KM; Masood U; Pawelke J; Wilkens JJ Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5120-9. PubMed ID: 26328963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning. Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility study: spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy. Chang S; Liu G; Zhao L; Dilworth JT; Zheng W; Jawad S; Yan D; Chen P; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Li X; Ding X Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):232. PubMed ID: 33028378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization via dose modifying factor modeling for FLASH effective dose. Ma J; Lin Y; Tang M; Zhu YN; Gan GN; Rotondo RL; Chen RC; Gao H Med Phys; 2024 Aug; 51(8):5190-5203. PubMed ID: 38873848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning. Zhu J; Penfold SN Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]