144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35213602)
1. Prognostic value of 11C-methionine volume-based PET parameters in IDH wild type glioblastoma.
van Dijken BRJ; Ankrah AO; Stormezand GN; Dierckx RAJO; Jan van Laar P; van der Hoorn A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0264387. PubMed ID: 35213602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of
Norikane T; Mitamura K; Yamamoto Y; Manabe Y; Murao M; Arai-Okuda H; Hatakeyama T; Miyake K; Nishiyama Y
J Neurooncol; 2024 Jan; 166(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 38160415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [PET/CT with 11C-methionine in assessment of brain glioma metabolism].
Vikhrova NB; Kalaeva DB; Tyurina AN; Belyaev AY; Danilov GV; Pronin IN
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2024; 88(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 38334732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of post-treatment metabolic tumor volume from
Jung TY; Min JJ; Bom HS; Jung S; Kim IY; Lim SH; Kim DY; Kwon SY
Neurosurg Rev; 2017 Apr; 40(2):223-229. PubMed ID: 27282449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Cicone F; Carideo L; Scaringi C; Arcella A; Giangaspero F; Scopinaro F; Minniti G
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 33(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 30607877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of traditional CHO PET parameters in distinguishing IDH, TERT and MGMT alterations in primary diffuse gliomas.
Kong Z; Zhang Y; Liu D; Liu P; Shi Y; Wang Y; Zhao D; Cheng X; Wang Y; Ma W
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 35(4):493-503. PubMed ID: 33532992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of volume-based measurements on (11)C-methionine PET in glioma patients.
Kobayashi K; Hirata K; Yamaguchi S; Manabe O; Terasaka S; Kobayashi H; Shiga T; Hattori N; Tanaka S; Kuge Y; Tamaki N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jun; 42(7):1071-80. PubMed ID: 25852010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Nomogram Modeling
Zhou W; Zhou Z; Wen J; Xie F; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Xiao J; Chen Y; Li M; Guan Y; Hua T
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1200. PubMed ID: 32850348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative
Pinho DF; King B; Xi Y; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):908-916. PubMed ID: 32069078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of early response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer measured with [11C]methionine-positron emission tomography.
Nuutinen J; Jyrkkiö S; Lehikoinen P; Lindholm P; Minn H
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Sep; 52(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 10580868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postchemoradiotherapy positron emission tomography predicts pathologic response and survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
Jayachandran P; Pai RK; Quon A; Graves E; Krakow TE; La T; Loo BW; Koong AC; Chang DT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 22381904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of preoperative intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity in early stage uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang SY; Ha S; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e15. PubMed ID: 26768781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiomics in Determining Tumor-to-Normal Brain SUV Ratio Based on
Danilov GV; Kalayeva DB; Vikhrova NB; Konakova TA; Zagorodnova AI; Popova AA; Postnov AA; Shugay SV; Pronin IN
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2023; 15(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 37388754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of baseline [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters MTV, TLG and asphericity in an international multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Zschaeck S; Li Y; Lin Q; Beck M; Amthauer H; Bauersachs L; Hajiyianni M; Rogasch J; Ehrhardt VH; Kalinauskaite G; Weingärtner J; Hartmann V; van den Hoff J; Budach V; Stromberger C; Hofheinz F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236841. PubMed ID: 32730364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
