525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35214391)
41. Patterning Wettability for Open-Surface Fluidic Manipulation: Fundamentals and Applications.
Sinha Mahapatra P; Ganguly R; Ghosh A; Chatterjee S; Lowrey S; Sommers AD; Megaridis CM
Chem Rev; 2022 Nov; 122(22):16752-16801. PubMed ID: 36195098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Low-cost feedback-controlled syringe pressure pumps for microfluidics applications.
Lake JR; Heyde KC; Ruder WC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175089. PubMed ID: 28369134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accelerating innovation and commercialization through standardization of microfluidic-based medical devices.
Reyes DR; van Heeren H; Guha S; Herbertson L; Tzannis AP; Ducrée J; Bissig H; Becker H
Lab Chip; 2021 Jan; 21(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 33289737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy.
Oh KW; Lee K; Ahn B; Furlani EP
Lab Chip; 2012 Feb; 12(3):515-45. PubMed ID: 22179505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Roll-to-roll fabrication of integrated PDMS-paper microfluidics for nucleic acid amplification.
Hiltunen J; Liedert C; Hiltunen M; Huttunen OH; Hiitola-Keinänen J; Aikio S; Harjanne M; Kurkinen M; Hakalahti L; Lee LP
Lab Chip; 2018 May; 18(11):1552-1559. PubMed ID: 29708259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Recent innovations in cost-effective polymer and paper hybrid microfluidic devices.
Zhou W; Dou M; Timilsina SS; Xu F; Li X
Lab Chip; 2021 Jul; 21(14):2658-2683. PubMed ID: 34180494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: A review.
Faustino V; Catarino SO; Lima R; Minas G
J Biomech; 2016 Jul; 49(11):2280-2292. PubMed ID: 26671220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Polymer Microfluidics: Simple, Low-Cost Fabrication Process Bridging Academic Lab Research to Commercialized Production.
Tsao CW
Micromachines (Basel); 2016 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 30404397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Negligible-cost microfluidic device fabrication using 3D-printed interconnecting channel scaffolds.
Felton H; Hughes R; Diaz-Gaxiola A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245206. PubMed ID: 33534849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sensor integration into microfluidic systems: trends and challenges.
Buttkewitz MA; Heuer C; Bahnemann J
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2023 Oct; 83():102978. PubMed ID: 37531802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A review of digital microfluidics as portable platforms for lab-on a-chip applications.
Samiei E; Tabrizian M; Hoorfar M
Lab Chip; 2016 Jul; 16(13):2376-96. PubMed ID: 27272540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optofluidic membrane interferometer: An imaging method for measuring microfluidic pressure and flow rate simultaneously on a chip.
Song W; Psaltis D
Biomicrofluidics; 2011 Dec; 5(4):44110-4411011. PubMed ID: 22662062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A smart and portable micropump for stable liquid delivery.
Zhang X; Xia K; Ji A; Xiang N
Electrophoresis; 2019 Mar; 40(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 30628114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A simple method for the evaluation of microfluidic architecture using flow quantitation via a multiplexed fluidic resistance measurement.
Leslie DC; Melnikoff BA; Marchiarullo DJ; Cash DR; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Lab Chip; 2010 Aug; 10(15):1960-6. PubMed ID: 20707008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Microfluidic Gut-on-a-Chip: Fundamentals and Challenges.
Thomas DP; Zhang J; Nguyen NT; Ta HT
Biosensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36671971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Microfluidic channel sensory system for electro-addressing cell location, determining confluency, and quantifying a general number of cells.
Rapier CE; Jagadeesan S; Vatine G; Ben-Yoav H
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3248. PubMed ID: 35228609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Integrated sensor networks with error correction for multiplexed particle tracking in microfluidic chips.
Wang N; Liu R; Asmare N; Chu CH; Sarioglu AF
Biosens Bioelectron; 2021 Feb; 174():112818. PubMed ID: 33250334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Automated Addressable Microfluidic Device for Minimally Disruptive Manipulation of Cells and Fluids within Living Cultures.
Tong A; Pham QL; Shah V; Naik A; Abatemarco P; Voronov R
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2020 Mar; 6(3):1809-1820. PubMed ID: 33455370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Toner and paper-based fabrication techniques for microfluidic applications.
Coltro WK; de Jesus DP; da Silva JA; do Lago CL; Carrilho E
Electrophoresis; 2010 Aug; 31(15):2487-98. PubMed ID: 20665911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Microvalves for Applications in Centrifugal Microfluidics.
Peshin S; Madou M; Kulinsky L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
