These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35216598)

  • 1. Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases.
    Xie J; Zhang L; Liu Z; Lu CL; Xu GH; Guo M; Lian X; Liu JQ; Zhang HW; Zheng SY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):52. PubMed ID: 35216598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
    Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
    Xiong WL; Li R; Lei HK; Jiang ZY
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 26477880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive Versus Open McKeown for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Zheng Y; Li Y; Liu X; Sun H; Shen S; Ba Y; Wang Z; Liu S; Xing W
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6329-6336. PubMed ID: 33987755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and feasibility of three-dimensional McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Bao T; Wang YJ; Li KK; Zhao XL; Liu B; He XD; Xie XF; Zhang L; Li KL; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6908-6914. PubMed ID: 37322359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
    J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution.
    Chen B; Zhang B; Zhu C; Ye Z; Wang C; Ma D; Ye M; Kong M; Jin J; Lin J; Wu C; Wang Z; Ye J; Zhang J; Hu Q
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82428. PubMed ID: 24376537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.