216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35217498)
21. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction.
Saito M; Kadoya N; Sato K; Ito K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Onishi H; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 28649722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Daily kV cone-beam CT and deformable image registration as a method for studying dosimetric consequences of anatomic changes in adaptive IMRT of head and neck cancer.
Elstrøm UV; Wysocka BA; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1101-8. PubMed ID: 20831502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
Guan H; Dong H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anthropomorphic lung phantom based validation of in-room proton therapy 4D-CBCT image correction for dose calculation.
Bondesson D; Meijers A; Janssens G; Rit S; Rabe M; Kamp F; Niepel K; Otter LAD; Both S; Brousmiche S; Dinkel J; Belka C; Parodi K; Knopf A; Kurz C; Landry G
Z Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 32(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 33248812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A clinical 3D/4D CBCT-based treatment dose monitoring system.
Qin A; Gersten D; Liang J; Liu Q; Grill I; Guerrero T; Stevens C; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):166-176. PubMed ID: 30306710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of kilovoltage X-ray volume imaging in patient dose calculation for head-and-neck and partial brain radiation therapy.
Hu W; Ye J; Wang J; Ma X; Zhang Z
Radiat Oncol; 2010 Apr; 5():29. PubMed ID: 20403191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Practically acquired and modified cone-beam computed tomography images for accurate dose calculation in head and neck cancer.
Hu CC; Huang WT; Tsai CL; Wu JK; Chao HL; Huang GM; Wang CW; Wu CJ; Cheng JC
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Oct; 187(10):633-44. PubMed ID: 21947125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 2D antiscatter grid and scatter sampling based CBCT method for online dose calculations during CBCT guided radiation therapy of pelvis.
Bayat F; Miller B; Park Y; Yu Z; Alexeev T; Thomas D; Stuhr K; Kavanagh B; Miften M; Altunbas C
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 38043086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measurement-based range evaluation for quality assurance of CBCT-based dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy.
Neppl S; Kurz C; Köpl D; Yohannes I; Schneider M; Bondesson D; Rabe M; Belka C; Dietrich O; Landry G; Parodi K; Kamp F
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4148-4159. PubMed ID: 34032301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer.
Kurz C; Dedes G; Resch A; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Nijhuis R; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26198654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of on-board imager cone beam CT hounsfield units for treatment planning using rigid image registration.
Rafic M; Ravindran P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 26881503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of reconstruction methods on dose distribution for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment plans.
Yedekci Y; Hurmuz P; Ozyigit G
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2023 Mar; 62(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 36526911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric accuracy of the cone-beam CT-based treatment planning of the Vero system: a phantom study.
Yohannes I; Prasetio H; Kallis K; Bert C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):106-113. PubMed ID: 27455496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation.
Richter A; Hu Q; Steglich D; Baier K; Wilbert J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
Radiat Oncol; 2008 Dec; 3():42. PubMed ID: 19087250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo calculation of imaging doses from diagnostic multidetector CT and kilovoltage cone-beam CT as part of prostate cancer treatment plans.
Ding A; Gu J; Trofimov AV; Xu XG
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6199-204. PubMed ID: 21302776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
