159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35218205)
1. The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early-stage cervical cancer.
Olthof EP; Mom CH; Snijders MLH; Wenzel HHB; van der Velden J; van der Aa MA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 May; 101(5):550-557. PubMed ID: 35218205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Aslan K; Meydanli MM; Oz M; Tohma YA; Haberal A; Ayhan A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e1. PubMed ID: 31788991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma.
Dai YF; Xu M; Zhong LY; Xie XY; Liu ZD; Yan MX; Yi H; Lin DM
J Int Med Res; 2018 Oct; 46(10):4082-4091. PubMed ID: 29963935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph Node Ratio Can Better Predict Prognosis than Absolute Number of Positive Lymph Nodes in Operable Cervical Carcinoma.
Widschwendter P; Polasik A; Janni W; de Gregorio A; Friedl TWP; de Gregorio N
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(3):87-95. PubMed ID: 31935729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer.
Fleming ND; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Munsell MF; Eifel PJ; Soliman PT; Nick AM; Westin SN; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 136(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25451695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy: A population-based study.
Ke Y; Zhang Z; Li Y; Qin Y; Yang Q; Zheng C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108258. PubMed ID: 38484490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes.
Wang R; Tao X; Wu X; Jiang H; Xia H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):946-952. PubMed ID: 31394263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.
Joo JH; Kim YS; Nam JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(30):e11711. PubMed ID: 30045335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio in Surgical Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.
Li X; Lin H; Sun Y; Gong J; Feng H; Tu J
J Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 236():2-11. PubMed ID: 30694756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery.
Fan X; Wang Y; Yang N; Zhu P
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):186. PubMed ID: 37344912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axillary lymph node ratio and total number of removed lymph nodes: predictors of survival in stage I and II breast cancer.
van der Wal BC; Butzelaar RM; van der Meij S; Boermeester MA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2002 Aug; 28(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 12217299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node ratio in inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell vulvar cancer: Results from the AGO-CaRE-1 study.
Polterauer S; Schwameis R; Grimm C; Hillemanns P; Jückstock J; Hilpert F; de Gregorio N; Hasenburg A; Sehouli J; Fürst ST; Strauß HG; Baumann K; Thiel F; Mustea A; Harter P; Wimberger P; Kölbl H; Reinthaller A; Woelber L; Mahner S
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):286-291. PubMed ID: 30760408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impact of regional positive lymph node ratio of gallbladder carcinoma on prognosis].
Zhou YM; Mi HC; Jiang W; Jiang Y; Hua YF; Lu CJ; Wang CN; Lu CD
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Nov; 44(11):1202-1207. PubMed ID: 36380669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Value of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes and Cut-Off for Lymph Node Ratio in the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Li Destri G; Barchitta M; Pesce A; Latteri S; Bosco D; Di Cataldo A; Agodi A; Puleo S
J Invest Surg; 2019 Jan; 32(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28972442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.
Tsuruga T; Fujimoto A; Kawana K; Mori M; Hasumi Y; Kino N; Tomio K; Miura S; Tanikawa M; Sone K; Miyamoto Y; Ikeda Y; Kojima S; Adachi K; Nagasaka K; Matsumoto Y; Arimoto T; Oda K; Nakagawa S; Horie K; Yasugi T; Yokota H; Osuga Y; Fujii T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 26438230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
