150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35218386)
1. Comparison of analytical sensitivity and efficiency for SARS-CoV-2 primer sets by TaqMan-based and SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR.
Tao Y; Yue Y; Qiu G; Ji Z; Spillman M; Gai Z; Chen Q; Bielecki M; Huber M; Trkola A; Wang Q; Cao J; Wang J
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Mar; 106(5-6):2207-2218. PubMed ID: 35218386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A rapid and low-cost protocol for the detection of B.1.1.7 lineage of SARS-CoV-2 by using SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR.
Abdel Sater F; Younes M; Nassar H; Nguewa P; Hamze K
Mol Biol Rep; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7243-7249. PubMed ID: 34613565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of cost-effective SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR and its evaluation in a sample pooling strategy for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Indonesian setting.
Rahmasari R; Raekiansyah M; Aliyah SH; Yodi P; Baihaqy F; Irhamsyah M; Sari KCDP; Suryadi H; Moi ML; Sauriasari R
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1817. PubMed ID: 38245603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A DNA intercalating dye-based RT-qPCR alternative to diagnose SARS-CoV-2.
Fuchs Wightman F; Godoy Herz MA; Muñoz JC; Stigliano JN; Bragado L; Moreno NN; Palavecino M; Servi L; Cabrerizo G; Clemente J; Avaro M; Pontoriero A; Benedetti E; Baumeister E; Rudolf F; Remes Lenicov F; Garcia C; Buggiano V; Kornblihtt AR; Srebrow A; de la Mata M; Muñoz MJ; Schor IE; Petrillo E
RNA Biol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):2218-2225. PubMed ID: 33966602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Analysis of Primer-Probe Sets for RT-qPCR of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2).
Jung Y; Park GS; Moon JH; Ku K; Beak SH; Lee CS; Kim S; Park EC; Park D; Lee JH; Byeon CW; Lee JJ; Maeng JS; Kim SJ; Kim SI; Kim BT; Lee MJ; Kim HG
ACS Infect Dis; 2020 Sep; 6(9):2513-2523. PubMed ID: 32786273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower cost alternatives for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19: conventional RT-PCR and SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR.
Dorlass EG; Monteiro CO; Viana AO; Soares CP; Machado RRG; Thomazelli LM; Araujo DB; Leal FB; Candido ED; Telezynski BL; Valério CA; Chalup VN; Mello R; Almeida FJ; Aguiar AS; Barrientos ACM; Sucupira C; De Paulis M; Sáfadi MAP; Silva DGBP; Sodré JJM; Soledade MP; Matos SF; Ferreira SR; Pinez CMN; Buonafine CP; Pieroni LNF; Malta FM; Santana RAF; Souza EC; Fock RA; Pinho JRR; Ferreira LCS; Botosso VF; Durigon EL; Oliveira DBL
Braz J Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 51(3):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 32767275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of cost-effective one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 infection using SYBR Green melting curve analysis.
Sarkar SL; Alam ASMRU; Das PK; Pramanik MHA; Al-Emran HM; Jahid IK; Hossain MA
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6501. PubMed ID: 35444203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of SYBR Green real time PCR for detecting SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples.
Pereira-Gómez M; Fajardo Á; Echeverría N; López-Tort F; Perbolianachis P; Costábile A; Aldunate F; Moreno P; Moratorio G
J Virol Methods; 2021 Mar; 289():114035. PubMed ID: 33285190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in COVID-19 Patients.
Lawrence Panchali MJ; Oh HJ; Lee YM; Kim CM; Tariq M; Seo JW; Kim DY; Yun NR; Kim DM
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0059121. PubMed ID: 35170995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 indirect and direct RT-qPCR detection methods.
Pearson JD; Trcka D; Lu S; Hyduk SJ; Jen M; Aynaud MM; Hernández JJ; Peidis P; Barrios-Rodiles M; Chan K; Woodgett J; Mazzulli T; Attisano L; Pelletier L; Cybulsky MI; Wrana JL; Bremner R
Virol J; 2021 May; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 34001180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-cost SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in an Indonesian setting using WHO-recommended primers.
Rahmasari R; Raekiansyah M; Azallea SN; Nethania M; Bilqisthy N; Rozaliyani A; Bowolaksono A; Sauriasari R
Heliyon; 2022 Nov; 8(11):e11130. PubMed ID: 36339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deepening of In Silico Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection RT-qPCR Assays in the Context of New Variants.
Gand M; Vanneste K; Thomas I; Van Gucht S; Capron A; Herman P; Roosens NHC; De Keersmaecker SCJ
Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33924636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe.
Haddar C; Verhoeven PO; Bourlet T; Pozzetto B; Pillet S
J Clin Virol; 2020 Nov; 132():104636. PubMed ID: 33099260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of RT-qPCR Primer-Probe Sets to Inform Public Health Interventions Based on COVID-19 Sewage Tests.
Xu X; Deng Y; Zheng X; Li S; Ding J; Yang Y; On HY; Yang R; Chui HK; Yau CI; Tun HM; Chin AWH; Poon LLM; Peiris M; Leung GM; Zhang T
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8875-8884. PubMed ID: 35584232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.
Banko A; Petrovic G; Miljanovic D; Loncar A; Vukcevic M; Despot D; Cirkovic A
Viruses; 2021 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 34372527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets.
Park C; Lee J; Hassan ZU; Ku KB; Kim SJ; Kim HG; Park EC; Park GS; Park D; Baek SH; Park D; Lee J; Jeon S; Kim S; Lee CS; Yoo HM; Kim S
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):358-367. PubMed ID: 33397829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation and comparison of the sensitivity of three commercial RT-qPCR kits used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Santiago, Chile.
Luraschi R; Santibáñez Á; Barrera-Avalos C; Vallejos-Vidal E; Mateluna-Flores C; Alarcón J; Cayunao J; Mella-Torres A; Hernández F; Inostroza-Molina A; Valdés D; Imarai M; Acuña-Castillo C; Reyes-López FE; Sandino AM
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1010336. PubMed ID: 36518569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytical performance comparison of four SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets for wastewater samples.
Zhang S; Li X; Shi J; Sivakumar M; Luby S; O'Brien J; Jiang G
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150572. PubMed ID: 34582851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 detection by rapid RT-qPCR universal for all primary respiratory materials.
Lübke N; Senff T; Scherger S; Hauka S; Andrée M; Adams O; Timm J; Walker A
J Clin Virol; 2020 Sep; 130():104579. PubMed ID: 32795959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection with mutations on N1 and E primer-probe region.
Liu S; Chai X; Liu C; Bai J; Meng J; Tian H; Han X; Han G; Li Q; Xu X
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; ():e0429223. PubMed ID: 38916349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
