221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35218426)
1. Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?
Chen YF; Vinayahalingam S; Bergé S; Liao YF; Maal T; Xi T
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4603-4613. PubMed ID: 35218426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Chen YF; Vinayahalingam S; Bergé S; Liao YF; Maal T; Xi T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1750.e1-1750.e10. PubMed ID: 33939960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional characterization of mandibular asymmetry in craniofacial microsomia.
Chen YF; Baan F; Bruggink R; Bronkhorst E; Liao YF; Ongkosuwito E
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4363-4372. PubMed ID: 32382927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.
Solem RC; Ruellas A; Ricks-Oddie JL; Kelly K; Oberoi S; Lee J; Miller A; Cevidanes L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):238-51. PubMed ID: 27476356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.
Shibazaki-Yorozuya R; Yamada A; Nagata S; Ueda K; Miller AJ; Maki K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):579-94. PubMed ID: 24785922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the adult three-dimensional craniofacial features of patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia with and without early mandible distraction.
Ko EW; Chen PK; Lo LJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 46(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 28359687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular asymmetry types and differences in dental compensations of Class III patients analyzed with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim HJ; Noh HK; Park HS
Angle Orthod; 2023 Nov; 93(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 37407513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation.
Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D-CT measurements of facial symmetry in severe CFM patients: A comparative study between mandibular ascending ramus distraction osteogenesis and bone grafting.
Li HW; Zou MJ; Zhang ZY; Tang XJ; Xu X; Ma LK; Feng S; Liu W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Feb; 52(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 38195299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Leung MY; Leung YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29636307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.
Ajmera DH; Hsung RT; Singh P; Wong NSM; Yeung AWK; Lam WYH; Khambay BS; Leung YY; Gu M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4947-4966. PubMed ID: 35320382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.
Olbrisch C; Santander P; Moser N; Klenke D; Meyer-Marcotty P; Quast A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Mar; 85(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 36018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial characteristics related to mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class I patients.
Thiesen G; Freitas MPM; Araújo EA; Gribel BF; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 29957327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is There a Difference in Orbital Volume Between Affected and Unaffected Sides in Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia?
Gribova MN; Pluijmers BI; Resnick CM; Caron CJJM; Borghi A; Koudstaal MJ; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 76(12):2625-2629. PubMed ID: 29859949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
