These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3521862)

  • 1. Further development of a computer-aided image analysis method of quantifying radiolucencies in approximal enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 3521862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximal radiolucencies in partially overlapped enamel: the need for quantitation and a preliminary assessment of a computer-aided image analysis method.
    Pitts NB
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Apr; 17(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 3459200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of approximal radiolucencies in enamel: a preliminary comparison between experienced clinicians and an image analysis method.
    Pitts NB
    J Dent; 1987 Oct; 15(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 3479462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of computer-aided image-analysis-derived estimates of the depth and area of radiolucencies in approximal enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    J Dent Res; 1985 Oct; 64(10):1221-4. PubMed ID: 3861653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis.
    Pitts NB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Sep; 58(3):358-66. PubMed ID: 6592535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image analysis of bitewing radiographs: a histologically validated comparison with visual assessments of radiolucency depth in enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    Br Dent J; 1986 Mar; 160(6):205-9. PubMed ID: 3456782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitfalls in radiographic interpretation, Part 1.
    Serman N; Singer S
    Dent Today; 2000 May; 19(5):100-5. PubMed ID: 12524768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can radiographic criteria be used to distinguish between cavitated and noncavitated approximal enamel caries?
    Kogen SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3472973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Monitoring the behaviour of posterior approximal carious lesions by image analysis of serial standardised bitewing radiographs'.
    Pitts NB
    Br Dent J; 1987 May; 162(10):378-9. PubMed ID: 3472539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Image analysis of bitewing radiographs'.
    Benn DK
    Br Dent J; 1986 Jun; 160(11):375-6. PubMed ID: 3459487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visualization of stannous fluoride treatment of carious lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A; White SC; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Mar; 69(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 2179803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic diagnosis of mineral loss in approximal enamel.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Caries Res; 1984; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 6583007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image analysis of radiolucencies in approximal enamel: a comparison of xeroradiographic and conventional film images.
    Shearer AC; Pitts NB; Wilson NH; Hutton JB; Wastell DG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 2726206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the caries definition on disease prevalence and distribution in 20-23 year old persons in Stockholm.
    Wikner S
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 8134893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo study of pixel grey-measurement in digital subtraction radiography for monitoring caries remineralization.
    Carneiro LS; Nunes CA; Silva MA; Leles CR; Mendonça EF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 19176648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.