133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35219544)
1. The efficiency of MarginProbe in detecting positive resection margins in epithelial breast cancer following breast conserving surgery.
Hoffman A; Ashkenazi I
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 35219544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Single institution's randomized double-armed prospective study of lumpectomy margins with adjunctive use of the MarginProbe in nonpalpable breast cancers.
Geha RC; Taback B; Cadena L; Borden B; Feldman S
Breast J; 2020 Nov; 26(11):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 32772474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.
Schnabel F; Boolbol SK; Gittleman M; Karni T; Tafra L; Feldman S; Police A; Friedman NB; Karlan S; Holmes D; Willey SC; Carmon M; Fernandez K; Akbari S; Harness J; Guerra L; Frazier T; Lane K; Simmons RM; Estabrook A; Allweis T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1589-95. PubMed ID: 24595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margin Assessment and Re-excision Rates for Patients Who Have Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Cen C; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Guth A; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):5142-5148. PubMed ID: 33635409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
LeeVan E; Ho BT; Seto S; Shen J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 32607640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MarginProbe© reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Blohmer JU; Tanko J; Kueper J; Groß J; Völker R; Machleidt A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 26796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Margin assessment before intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery-Does the addition of MarginProbe decrease the need for addition of fractionated whole breast radiation?
Hermann N; Haas I; Malinger P; Kaufman Z
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1343-1346. PubMed ID: 32367618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?
Sorrentino L; Agozzino M; Albasini S; Bossi D; Mazzucchelli S; Vanna R; Papadopoulou O; Villani L; Corsi F
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():141-146. PubMed ID: 31500779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Close and Positive Lumpectomy Margins are Associated with Similar Rates of Residual Disease with Additional Surgery.
Fitzgerald S; Romanoff A; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz C; Bleiweis IJ; Jaffer S; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4270-4276. PubMed ID: 27581606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
