These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35220480)
61. Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses. Lubusky M; Prochazka M; Langova M; Vomackova K; Cizek L Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 18345272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Use of fetal biometry in the assessment of gestational age in South East Nigeria: Femur length and biparietal diameter. Adiri CO; Anyanwu GE; Agwuna KK; Obikili EN; Ezugworie OJ; Agu AU; Nto J; Ezeofor SN Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 25966718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios. Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155]. Créquat J; Duyme M; Brodaty G Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Jun; 28(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 10935308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study. Napolitano R; Donadono V; Ohuma EO; Knight CL; Wanyonyi SZ; Kemp B; Norris T; Papageorghiou AT Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27158767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Pang MW; Leung TN; Sahota DS; Lau TK; Chang AM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 12942500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Evaluation of fetal kidney length as a marker for fetal biometry. Choudhary A; Sibia P; Kaur S; Gupta S; Gambhir P; Kaur R Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Sep; 310(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 38365961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones. Paladini D; Rustico M; Viora E; Giani U; Bruzzese D; Campogrande M; Martinelli P Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 15966062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Second-trimester assessment of gestational age in twins: validation of singleton biometry charts. Dias T; Arcangeli T; Bhide A; Mahsud-Dornan S; Papageorghiou A; Thilaganathan B Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 20617507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Reference charts of foetal biometry in Asians. Lai FM; Yeo GS Singapore Med J; 1995 Dec; 36(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 8781636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Chitty LS; Altman DG; Henderson A; Campbell S Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 8297866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Fetal interlens distance: normal values during pregnancy. Kivilevitch Z; Salomon LJ; Benoit B; Achiron R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 20069675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Application of the INTERGROWTH-21st chart compared to customized growth charts in fetuses with left heart obstruction: late trimester biometry, cerebroplacental hemodynamics and perinatal outcome. Graupner O; Helfrich F; Ostermayer E; Lobmaier SM; Ortiz JU; Ewert P; Wacker-Gussmann A; Haller B; Axt-Fliedner R; Enzensberger C; Abel K; Karge A; Oberhoffer R; Kuschel B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):601-613. PubMed ID: 31139902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Nomograms of the axial fetal cerebellar hemisphere circumference and area throughout gestation. Sherer DM; Sokolovski M; Dalloul M; Pezzullo JC; Osho JA; Abulafia O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 29(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 17171631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Use of Z-scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve. Sananes N; Guigue V; Kohler M; Bouffet N; Cancellier M; Hornecker F; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Schmerber E; Tanghe M; Nisand I; Favre R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 19731264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Ultrasonographic fetal biometry charts in Niger]. Vangeenderhuysen C; Nono M Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10399699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Greater estimated fetal weight and birth weight in IVF/ICSI pregnancy after frozen-thawed vs fresh blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study with novel unified modeling methodology. Cavoretto PI; Farina A; Gaeta G; Seidenari A; Pozzoni M; Spinillo S; Morano D; Alteri A; Viganò P; Candiani M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 60(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 34716733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]