These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35220775)

  • 1. Determining a Cutoff Value for Hand Grip Strength to Predict Favorable Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
    Kwon O; Ham DW; Kim HJ; Lee S; Park SM; Yeom JS
    Global Spine J; 2023 Oct; 13(8):2210-2217. PubMed ID: 35220775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Hand Grip Strength on Surgical Outcomes After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Kwon O; Kim HJ; Shen F; Park SM; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1493-E1499. PubMed ID: 32756282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result.
    Shen F; Kim HJ; Lee NK; Chun HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2018-2024. PubMed ID: 29679727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hand grip strength can predict clinical outcomes and risk of falls after decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kwon JW; Lee BH; Lee SB; Sung S; Lee CU; Yang JH; Park MS; Byun J; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1960-1967. PubMed ID: 32622937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive analysis in 104 patients. Does the cause of deformity influence the outcome?
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 28475018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab F; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis T; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Hostin R; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Kim HJ; Deviren V; Soroceanu A; Hart RA; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 26047345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective assessment of the safety and early outcomes of sublaminar band placement for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis.
    Viswanathan VK; Kukreja S; Minnema AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):520-531. PubMed ID: 29424677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
    Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries.
    Passias PG; Segreto FA; Lafage R; Lafage V; Smith JS; Line BG; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Diebo BG; Vira S; Gupta MC; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP; Bess S;
    Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 30930292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can we use shorter constructs while maintaining satisfactory sagittal plane alignment for adult spinal deformity?
    Moridaira H; Inami S; Takeuchi D; Ueda H; Aoki H; Imura T; Taneichi H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Dec; 34(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 33361482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative patient-reported outcome score thresholds predict the likelihood of reaching MCID with surgical correction of adult spinal deformity.
    Leyton-Mange A; Truumees E; Bozic KJ; Singh D; Liu TC; Stokes JK; Mahometa MJ; Geck MJ
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):207-219. PubMed ID: 32779122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Handgrip Strength and Psoas Muscle Index on Analgesic Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease.
    Kim SH; Park SJ; Yoon KB; Jun EK; Cho J; Kim HJ
    Pain Physician; 2022 Oct; 25(7):E1105-E1113. PubMed ID: 36288597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The standing T1-L1 pelvic angle: a useful radiographic predictor of proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity.
    Takasawa E; Kawamura N; Iizuka Y; Ohya J; Onishi Y; Kunogi J; Chikuda H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Apr; 36(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 34740179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a preoperative predictive model for major complications following adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Scheer JK; Smith JS; Schwab F; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Daniels AH; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Mundis GM; Sciubba DM; Ailon T; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):736-743. PubMed ID: 28338449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of preoperative depression on 2-year clinical outcomes following adult spinal deformity surgery: the importance of risk stratification based on type of psychological distress.
    Theologis AA; Ailon T; Scheer JK; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Gupta M; Klineberg EO; Kebaish K; Schwab F; Lafage V; Burton D; Hart R; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):477-485. PubMed ID: 27153146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.