221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35222020)
1. Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Biosimilar Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():778505. PubMed ID: 35222020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhou T; Wang X; Cao Y; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1367. PubMed ID: 36397064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhou T; Cao Y; Wang X; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2165-2177. PubMed ID: 35296994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.
Ren Z; Xu J; Bai Y; Xu A; Cang S; Du C; Li Q; Lu Y; Chen Y; Guo Y; Chen Z; Liu B; Jia W; Wu J; Wang J; Shao G; Zhang B; Shan Y; Meng Z; Wu J; Gu S; Yang W; Liu C; Shi X; Gao Z; Yin T; Cui J; Huang M; Xing B; Mao Y; Teng G; Qin Y; Wang J; Xia F; Yin G; Yang Y; Chen M; Wang Y; Zhou H; Fan J;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):977-990. PubMed ID: 34143971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus an Anti-VEGF Antibody as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Li L; Yang S; Chen Y; Tian L; He Y; Wu B; Dong D
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():891008. PubMed ID: 35721168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhu H
Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1103055. PubMed ID: 36713376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A real-world analysis of survival and cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar regimen in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zeng X; Jia Y; Chen H; Luo Q; Zhao H; Liang G; Chen W; Li Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Sep; 149(11):9213-9219. PubMed ID: 37188985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus IBI305 versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatic cell carcinoma in China.
Xu Z; Ye ZM; Tang YK; Deng DF; Zhou Q; Fang M; Zhang YY; Li XP
Cancer Med; 2023 Jul; 12(14):14871-14880. PubMed ID: 37434398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wang L; Peng Y; Qin S; Wan X; Zeng X; Li S; Liu Q; Tan C
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0279786. PubMed ID: 37053300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhao M; Pan X; Yin Y; Hu H; Wei J; Bai Z; Tang W
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():869960. PubMed ID: 35493395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.
Wen F; Zheng H; Zhang P; Liao W; Zhou K; Li Q
Liver Int; 2021 May; 41(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 33556230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum and pemetrexed plus platinum alone as a first-line therapy for Chinese patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Shi Y; Qian D; Li Y; Chen W; Bo M; Zhang M; Shi J; Jia B; Dai Y; Li G
Transl Cancer Res; 2023 Apr; 12(4):928-938. PubMed ID: 37180653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Chiang CL; Chan SK; Lee SF; Choi HC
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33668100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sorafenib as first-line treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Singapore.
Chee CE; Khara JS; Cheong J; Fong J; Sivanesan S; Choy JY; Hu M; Viswambaram A; Toh HC
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Jun; 24(5):631-641. PubMed ID: 38776431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab vs. placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for local advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Shao T; Zhao M; Tang W
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():953671. PubMed ID: 36561521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
