176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35223383)
1. When Doctors and AI Interact: on Human Responsibility for Artificial Risks.
Verdicchio M; Perin A
Philos Technol; 2022; 35(1):11. PubMed ID: 35223383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible.
Tigard DW
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 34109925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability.
Coeckelbergh M
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2051-2068. PubMed ID: 31650511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status.
Schwitzgebel E
Patterns (N Y); 2023 Aug; 4(8):100818. PubMed ID: 37602213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the Social-Relational Moral Standing of AI: An Empirical Study Using AI-Generated Art.
Lima G; Zhunis A; Manovich L; Cha M
Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():719944. PubMed ID: 34422916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Find the Gap: AI, Responsible Agency and Vulnerability.
Vallor S; Vierkant T
Minds Mach (Dordr); 2024; 34(3):20. PubMed ID: 38855350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsibility Gaps and Black Box Healthcare AI: Shared Responsibilization as a Solution.
Lang BH; Nyholm S; Blumenthal-Barby J
Digit Soc; 2023 Dec; 2(3):52. PubMed ID: 38596344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AI Moral Enhancement: Upgrading the Socio-Technical System of Moral Engagement.
Volkman R; Gabriels K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Mar; 29(2):11. PubMed ID: 36952140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing human agency through redress in Artificial Intelligence Systems.
Fanni R; Steinkogler VE; Zampedri G; Pierson J
AI Soc; 2023; 38(2):537-547. PubMed ID: 35692234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Agents in Natural Moral Communities: A Brief Clarification.
Tigard DW
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):455-458. PubMed ID: 34109922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical content in artificial intelligence systems: A demand explained in three critical points.
Bertoncini ALC; Serafim MC
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1074787. PubMed ID: 37063544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Let Me Take Over: Variable Autonomy for Meaningful Human Control.
Methnani L; Aler Tubella A; Dignum V; Theodorou A
Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():737072. PubMed ID: 34595471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three Risks That Caution Against a Premature Implementation of Artificial Moral Agents for Practical and Economical Use.
Herzog C
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):3. PubMed ID: 33496885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-person representations and responsible agency in AI.
Sebastián MÁ
Synthese; 2021; 199(3-4):7061-7079. PubMed ID: 33758436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AI Systems and Respect for Human Autonomy.
Laitinen A; Sahlgren O
Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():705164. PubMed ID: 34765969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Owning Decisions: AI Decision-Support and the Attributability-Gap.
Zeiser J
Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 Jun; 30(4):27. PubMed ID: 38888795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents.
Véliz C
AI Soc; 2021 Jun; 36(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 36568029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Enactive and Interactive Dimensions of AI: Ingenuity and Imagination Through the Lens of Art and Music.
Sato M; McKinney J
Artif Life; 2022 Aug; 28(3):310-321. PubMed ID: 35881681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffused responsibility: attributions of responsibility in the use of AI-driven clinical decision support systems.
Bleher H; Braun M
AI Ethics; 2022; 2(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 35098247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In principle obstacles for empathic AI: why we can't replace human empathy in healthcare.
Montemayor C; Halpern J; Fairweather A
AI Soc; 2022; 37(4):1353-1359. PubMed ID: 34054228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
