139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225072)
1. Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Lumpectomy of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Versus Ultrasound-Guided Excision.
Guo W; Ji W; Zhang T; Xing Z; Xing F
Surg Innov; 2022 Oct; 29(5):573-578. PubMed ID: 35225072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided excision: A randomized clinical trial.
Tong M; Guo W
Breast J; 2019 Mar; 25(2):278-281. PubMed ID: 30801900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence guidance for excision of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Liu J; Guo W; Tong M
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):266. PubMed ID: 27756411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial.
Rahusen FD; Bremers AJ; Fabry HF; van Amerongen AH; Boom RP; Meijer S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 9(10):994-8. PubMed ID: 12464592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin.
Slijkhuis WA; Noorda EM; van der Zaag-Loonen H; Eenennaam MJ; Greve KE; Lastdrager WB; Gratama JW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 27444926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgeon performed continuous intraoperative ultrasound guidance decreases re-excisions and mastectomy rates in breast cancer.
Karadeniz Cakmak G; Emre AU; Tascilar O; Bahadir B; Ozkan S
Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():23-28. PubMed ID: 28273552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of outcomes of surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasonography-guided wire localization and preoperative wire localization in nonpalpable breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery: A retrospective cohort study.
Shin YD; Choi YJ; Kim DH; Park SS; Choi H; Kim DJ; Park S; Yun HY; Song YJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9340. PubMed ID: 29390405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-Guided Versus Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer.
Eggemann H; Costa SD; Ignatov A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 26439275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery.
Krishna KL; Srinath BS; Santosh D; Velusamy S; Divyamala KP; Sariya Mohammadi J; Kurpad V; Kulkarni S; Yaji P; Goud S; Dhanireddy S; Ram J
Breast Dis; 2020; 39(3-4):127-135. PubMed ID: 32831188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Combi F; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Regolo L; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Mazzucchelli S; Sorrentino L
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 30742309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer.
Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Beni A; Costa SD; Ignatov A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.
Krekel NM; Zonderhuis BM; Stockmann HB; Schreurs WH; van der Veen H; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21194880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of intraoperative ultrasound in breast-conserving surgery of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Sikošek NČ; Dovnik A; Arko D; Takač I
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2014 Feb; 126(3-4):90-4. PubMed ID: 24442857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of an intraoperative ultrasonography-guided localization and tissue fixation device demonstrates less margin positivity during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer than standard preoperative needle-wire localization: a retrospective comparative analysis in a consecutively treated case series.
Povoski SP; Jimenez RE; Wang WP
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24176781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: A feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins.
Rahusen FD; Taets van Amerongen AH; van Diest PJ; Borgstein PJ; Bleichrodt RP; Meijer S
J Surg Oncol; 1999 Oct; 72(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 10518102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided lumpectomy versus wire-guided excision for nonpalpable breast cancer.
Hu X; Li S; Jiang Y; Wei W; Ji Y; Li Q; Jiang Z
J Int Med Res; 2020 Jan; 48(1):300060519896707. PubMed ID: 31937169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of Wire-guided Technique With Bracketing Reduces Resection Volumes in Breast-conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer.
Civil YA; Duvivier KM; Perin P; Baan AH; van der Velde S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e749-e756. PubMed ID: 32653472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radio-guided and clip-guided preoperative localization for malignant microcalcifications offer similar performances in breast-conserving surgery.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Sartani A; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Scoccia E; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Truffi M; Bonizzi A; Sorrentino L
Breast J; 2019 Sep; 25(5):865-873. PubMed ID: 31187568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: still much to be gained].
Krekel NM; Haloua MH; Muller S; Bergers E; Rietveld DH; Meijers S; van den Tol MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(29):A3573. PubMed ID: 22831490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]