177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225429)
1. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information.
Frost JC; Baldwin AJ
Infect Dis Health; 2023 May; 28(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 36564245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Pattenden TA; Raleigh RA; Pattenden ER; Thangasamy IA
BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):412-418. PubMed ID: 35474701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
Kaya E; Görmez S
Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?
Kianian R; Hu MY; Lavold AJ; Andino JJ; Morrison JC; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr; 42(2):408-414. PubMed ID: 37853530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.
Lucy AT; Rakestraw SL; Stringer C; Chu D; Grams J; Stahl R; Mustian MN
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6519-6525. PubMed ID: 37277519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education materials for the medical treatment of open-angle glaucoma.
Crabtree L; Lee E
BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022; 7(1):e000966. PubMed ID: 35415266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Available patient-centered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it?
Leira Y; Castelo-Baz P; Pérez-Sayáns M; Blanco J; Lorenzo-Pouso AI
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1569-1574. PubMed ID: 30132142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High tibial osteotomy: A review of the readability and quality of patient information on the internet.
Clark M; Baxter IC; Hampton M; Sandler RD; Legg A
Health Promot Perspect; 2021; 11(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 34660227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
Docimo S; Seeras K; Acho R; Pryor A; Spaniolas K
Hernia; 2022 Jun; 26(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 35344107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability Analysis of Otolaryngology Consent Documents on the iMed Consent Platform.
Hannabass K; Lee J
Mil Med; 2023 Mar; 188(3-4):780-785. PubMed ID: 35022788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
