98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225479)
21. Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Kasunan A; Sribanditmongkol N; Siriaungkul S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 119(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 22939281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Conservative Treatment for Patients with Carcinoma in Situ-Positive Margins After a Loop Electroexcisional Procedure: Is It Safe?
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee YS; Cho YL; Park JY; Hong DG
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(1-2):37-44. PubMed ID: 29999280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors associated with cone margin involvement in CIN patients undergoing conization-equivalent electrosurgical procedure.
Costa S; De Nuzzo M; Terzano P; Santini D; De Simone P; Bovicelli A; Bovicelli L; Bucchi L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 10929960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Should attention be paid to the cone depth in the fully visible transformation zone? Retrospective analysis of 517 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Di Giuseppe J; Gardella B; Bogani G; Monti E; Liverani CA; Roncella E; Raspagliesi F; Spinillo A; Vercellini P; Ciavattini A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 36263898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity.
Bae HS; Chung YW; Kim T; Lee KW; Song JY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 23034067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study.
Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The case for cytologic follow-up after LEEP.
Hanau CA; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 9167693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [LEEP in gynecologic practice].
Paweł Siekierski B; Tymińska A; Sikora S; Dembowiecka-Ochman J
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 10375931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].
Kovachev S; Nacheva A; Atanassova V; Piperkova N; Kostov I; Vasilev N
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(5):20-5. PubMed ID: 21268398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The value of the endocervical margin status in LEEP: analysis of 610 cases.
Mirandez CC; Yoneda JY; Gertrudes LN; Carvalho CF; Derchain S; Teixeira JC; Vale DB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):851-856. PubMed ID: 35220477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cervical Conization to Exclude Cervical Cancer Before Simple Hysterectomy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Peterson P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Apr; 24(2):202-205. PubMed ID: 32243315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure-Cone.
Tillmanns TD; Falkner CA; Engle DB; Wan JY; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Zuna R; Gold MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Feb; 100(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 16321430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
