98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225479)
41. Cervical sonography in pregnant women with a prior cone biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Fischer RL; Sveinbjornsson G; Hansen C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 36(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 20503232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone.
Berretta R; Gizzo S; Dall'Asta A; Mazzone E; Monica M; Franchi L; Peri F; Patrelli TS; Bacchi Modena A
Dis Markers; 2013; 35(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 24324288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The oncological and obstetric outcomes of cervical squamous cell carcinoma at stage IA1 managed with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Chen S; Liu J; Shi C; Gao X; Bai H
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 60(4):718-722. PubMed ID: 34247813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kawano K; Tsuda N; Nishio S; Yonemoto K; Tasaki K; Tasaki R; Ushijima K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(5):e54. PubMed ID: 27401478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
Beyer DA; Rody A; Schmidt N; Cirkel C; Neumann K
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2017 Dec; 18(4):185-189. PubMed ID: 29278231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Clearance of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus is Sooner After Thin Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (t-LEEP).
Zhang W; Gong X; Wu Q; Liu Y; Lao G; Xiao J; Yang L; Liu P; Ma C
J Invest Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(6):560-565. PubMed ID: 30212232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Noehr B; Jensen A; Frederiksen K; Tabor A; Kjaer SK
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 114(6):1232-1238. PubMed ID: 19935024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision for cervical preneoplasia.
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Ratchusiri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 16435996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. "Top hat" versus conventional loop electrosurgical excision procedure in women with a type 3 transformation zone.
Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K; Settakorn J; Srisomboon J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 109(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 20022598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.
Sun Y; He Y; Zhuoma M; Hua Z; Sun Z; Jiang N; Kong F; Xiao Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):260. PubMed ID: 37612769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Unraveling cervical cancer screening dilemmas: histopathological insights from VIA and LEEP at bugando medical centre, Mwanza.
Kaizilege GK; Ndaboine E; Chuma C; Mujuni F; Kiritta R; Matovelo D; Ottoman O; Elias E; Masalu N; Kidenya BR; Mazigo HD
BMC Cancer; 2024 Jan; 24(1):66. PubMed ID: 38216912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Is Endocervical Glandular Involvement Related to The Depth of Cone Biopsy?
Akis S; Keles E; Ozyurek SE; Purut YE; Ozturk UK; Kabaca C; Api M; Cetiner H
Int J Surg Pathol; 2023 Feb; 31(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35651307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics.
Khan MJ; Smith-McCune KK
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1339-1343. PubMed ID: 24807323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Risk factors of LEEP margin positivity and optimal length of cervical conization in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Cong Q; Yu Y; Xie Y; Li Y; Sui L
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1209811. PubMed ID: 37427119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Sexual Dysfunction in Korean Women.
Kim BR; Kim MK; Kim YH
J Korean Med Sci; 2023 May; 38(18):e144. PubMed ID: 37158776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Operator Sex and Experience Do Not Influence Conization Outcomes in Terms of Cone Volume, Depth or Resection Margins.
Stefanovic S; Mitic IS; Sütterlin M; WEIß C; Spaich S
In Vivo; 2023; 37(2):841-847. PubMed ID: 36881101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of General and Local Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Güngördük K; Türkmen HE; Gülseren V; Küçükler B; Çelikkol Ö; Özdemir İA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jul; 27(3):217-222. PubMed ID: 37194724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
