These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225716)

  • 1. Use of a High-Fidelity Training Simulator for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Increases Working Knowledge and Technical Skills Among Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Trainees.
    Melcher C; Hussain I; Kirnaz S; Goldberg JL; Sommer F; Navarro-Ramirez R; Medary B; Härtl R
    Global Spine J; 2023 Oct; 13(8):2182-2192. PubMed ID: 35225716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
    McGrath LB; White-Dzuro GA; Hofstetter CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Apr; 30(4):491-499. PubMed ID: 30641853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metrics Development for Minimal Invasive Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Spondylolisthesis by an International Expert Panel.
    Melcher C; Korge A; Cunningham M; Foley KT; Härtl R
    Global Spine J; 2020 Apr; 10(2 Suppl):168S-175S. PubMed ID: 32528801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Discectomy.
    Cho HS; Kim SH; Han JS; Kim BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 175():e1307-e1314. PubMed ID: 37164207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "One and a half" minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with adjacent segment unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for spondylolisthesis with bisegmental stenosis.
    Wipplinger C; Melcher C; Hernandez RN; Lener S; Navarro-Ramirez R; Kirnaz S; Schmidt FA; Kim E; Härtl R
    J Spine Surg; 2018 Dec; 4(4):780-786. PubMed ID: 30714010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Cervical Decompression via Unilateral Tubular Laminotomy: Technical Note and Early Clinical Experience.
    Hernandez RN; Wipplinger C; Navarro-Ramirez R; Soriano-Solis S; Kirnaz S; Hussain I; Schmidt FA; Soriano-Sánchez JA; Härtl R
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Mar; 18(3):284-294. PubMed ID: 31245806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peritonsillar Abscess Simulator: A Low-Cost, High-Fidelity Trainer.
    Keller CR; Nebor I; Choi D; Moreno K; Patil YJ
    J Educ Teach Emerg Med; 2022 Apr; 7(2):I1-I9. PubMed ID: 37465440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of unilateral versus standard open midline approach for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: is "over the top" really better? A Swiss prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Gravestock I; Pichierri G; Wertli MM; Steurer J; Farshad M; Porchet F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Aug; 31(2):236-245. PubMed ID: 31026821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects.
    Weinstock P; Rehder R; Prabhu SP; Forbes PW; Roussin CJ; Cohen AR
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28438070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.
    Alvarez-Lopez F; Maina MF; Saigí-Rubió F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e17491. PubMed ID: 32673217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-Fidelity Emergency Department Thoracotomy Simulator With Beating-Heart Technology and OSATS Tool Improves Trainee Confidence and Distinguishes Level of Skill.
    Bohnen JD; Demetri L; Fuentes E; Butler K; Askari R; Anand RJ; Petrusa E; Kaafarani HMA; Yeh DD; Saillant N; King D; Briggs S; Velmahos GC; Moya M
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(5):1357-1366. PubMed ID: 29496361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression: A Case Series Studying One- and Two-Year Outcomes with Predictors of Minimal Clinical Improvement.
    Knio ZO; Schallmo MS; Hsu W; Corona BT; Lackey JT; Marquez-Lara A; Luo TD; Medda S; Wham BC; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e290-e297. PubMed ID: 31356984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-L5: comparative study.
    Chen KT; Choi KC; Shim HK; Lee DC; Kim JS
    Int Orthop; 2022 Dec; 46(12):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 35984476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Outside-In Approach: A Proctorship Guideline With 12 Steps of Effectiveness and Safety.
    Kim HS; Wu PH; Jang IT
    Neurospine; 2020 Jul; 17(Suppl 1):S99-S109. PubMed ID: 32746523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.