BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225852)

  • 1. Long-Term Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.
    Lee CC; Perng CK; Ma H; Wu SH; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Lien PJ; Feng CJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(1s Suppl 1):S78-S84. PubMed ID: 35225852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Aesthetics and Satisfaction in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Implants and Fat Grafting.
    Qureshi AA; Odom EB; Parikh RP; Myckatyn TM; Tenenbaum MM
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Oct; 37(9):999-1008. PubMed ID: 28379284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
    Gui GP; Tan SM; Faliakou EC; Choy C; A'Hern R; Ward A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):125-38; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 12496573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: Aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer.
    Brennan ME; Flitcroft K; Warrier S; Snook K; Spillane AJ
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():59-65. PubMed ID: 27611237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience.
    Pacella SJ; Vogel JE; Locke MB; Codner MA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 21317117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications.
    Davila AA; Mioton LM; Chow G; Wang E; Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; Fine N; Kim JY
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Oct; 47(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 23547540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
    Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
    Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.
    Frey JD; Choi M; Salibian AA; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jun; 139(6):1300-1310. PubMed ID: 28538548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Study of Nipple-Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander-Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Kim H; Park SJ; Woo KJ; Bang SI
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(2):313-327. PubMed ID: 30746565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.
    Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35927501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
    Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients.
    Casella D; Di Taranto G; Onesti MG; Greco M; Ribuffo D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 30827802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Higher reconstruction failure and less patient-reported satisfaction after post mastectomy radiotherapy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction compared to immediate autologous breast reconstruction.
    Reinders FCJ; Young-Afat DA; Batenburg MCT; Bruekers SE; van Amerongen EA; Macaré van Maurik JFM; Braakenburg A; Zonnevylle E; Hoefkens M; Teunis T; Verkooijen HM; van den Bongard HJGD; Maarse W
    Breast Cancer; 2020 May; 27(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 31858435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
    Caputo GG; Vigato E; Rampino Cordaro E; Parodi PC; Governa M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2573-2579. PubMed ID: 33947651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Biological Scaffold (Biodesign) in Postmastectomy Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A 5-Year Single-Institution Experience.
    Sou WK; Perng CK; Ma H; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Lien PJ; Hsiao FY; Feng CJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(1s Suppl 1):S92-S98. PubMed ID: 35225854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.