160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225854)
1. The Effect of Biological Scaffold (Biodesign) in Postmastectomy Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A 5-Year Single-Institution Experience.
Sou WK; Perng CK; Ma H; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Lien PJ; Hsiao FY; Feng CJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(1s Suppl 1):S92-S98. PubMed ID: 35225854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
Heine N; Hoesl V; Seitz S; Prantl L; Brebant V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.
Hille-Betz U; Kniebusch N; Wojcinski S; Henseler H; Heyl V; Ohlinger R; Paepke S; Klapdor R; Krause-Bergmann B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 25300607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques.
Mosharrafa AM; Mosharrafa TM; Zannis VJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 32332524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Comparison of Strattice and SurgiMend in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mazari FAK; Wattoo GM; Kazzazi NH; Kolar KM; Olubowale OO; Rogers CE; Azmy IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):283-293. PubMed ID: 29369979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35927501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct-to-Implant Versus 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: Which Technique Is Better? An Analysis of 104 Patients at a Single Institution.
Piper ML; Rios-Diaz AJ; Kimia R; Cunning J; Broach R; Wu L; Serletti J; Fosnot J
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 89(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 35703187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Decade of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Lessons Learned in 3035 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions.
Lin AM; Lorenzi R; Van Der Hulst JE; Liao EC; Austen WG; Webster A; Smith BL; Colwell AS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):277-287. PubMed ID: 37141449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Johnson AC; Colakoglu S; Siddikoglu D; Li A; Kaoutzanis C; Cohen JB; Chong TW; Mathes DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 35499525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
