162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35225854)
21. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Short-Term Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Hunsicker LM; Ashikari AY; Berry C; Koch RM; Salzberg CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jan; 78(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 26849284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. "Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Choi M; Frey JD; Alperovich M; Levine JP; Karp NS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):184e-191e. PubMed ID: 27465178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermis and Polypropylene Meshes in Subpectoral Implant Placement.
Schüler K; Paepke S; Kohlmann T; Alwafai Z; Nawroth F; Zygmunt M; Ohlinger R
In Vivo; 2021; 35(5):2739-2746. PubMed ID: 34410963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
Colwell AS; Damjanovic B; Zahedi B; Medford-Davis L; Hertl C; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 22094736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; Johnson RK; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 36728408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bostwick Autoderm and Implant Technique: Improved Outcomes for Obese Patients in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Danker S; Schmitt M; Smith N; Chong HJ; Sandholm PH; Murphy JA; Ladizinsky DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):187e-195e. PubMed ID: 33165289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Complications in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Human Tissues.
Broyles JM; Liao EC; Kim J; Heistein J; Sisco M; Karp N; Lau FH; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 33877063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Symmetry of Nipple Position After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction: The Impact of Reconstructive Method.
Mercury O; Nores GG; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S422-S426. PubMed ID: 35690937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Porcine Acellular Peritoneal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Arm Trial.
Simpson AM; Higdon KK; Kilgo MS; Tepper DG; Alizadeh K; Glat PM; Agarwal JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):10e-21e. PubMed ID: 30589773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): long-term outcomes and complications.
Salzberg CA; Dunavant C; Nocera N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 23153519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Aesthetics and Satisfaction in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Implants and Fat Grafting.
Qureshi AA; Odom EB; Parikh RP; Myckatyn TM; Tenenbaum MM
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Oct; 37(9):999-1008. PubMed ID: 28379284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
