These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3522594)

  • 21. [Prosthetic aspects in endosseous implantation].
    Otto G; Hampel H; Krause O
    Stomatol DDR; 1977 Nov; 27(11):747-51. PubMed ID: 341422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Load transmission in implant superstructures supported by natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants. A preliminary report.
    Hobkirk JA; Tanner SR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Mar; 3(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 8603151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variations in occlusal forces with a resilient internal implant shock absorber.
    Chapman RJ; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 2094655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A study of load stress on an implant and a tooth supported fixed bridge for the first mandibular molar].
    Chao Y; Yang Y; Du C
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 11776528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rigid connections between natural teeth and implants: a technical note.
    Lindh T; Gunne J; Danielsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 9337030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
    Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite element analysis of a three unit fixed partial denture cast with nickel-chromium alloy.
    Isaac L; Shetty P; Rajeev A; Jayalakshmi BR
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10865388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effects of clasp designs of Kennedy Class II RPD on the displacement of alveolar bone around the abutment tooth--an under load hologram study].
    Li M; Xiao M; Li H; Fu Q
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Apr; 19(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 12539416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of a vitreous carbon implant as a distal abutment for a fixed bridge.
    Cohen BD
    Oral Implantol; 1976; 6(3):389-422. PubMed ID: 802131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems.
    Baiamonte T; Abbate MF; Pizzarello F; Lozada J; James R
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9151632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.