BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35226147)

  • 1. Comparing the 2017 ASCO/CAP guideline for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma surgical specimen to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline for breast cancer in assessing the HER2 status in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
    Chao WR; Lee MY; Lee YJ; Sheu GT; Han CP
    Virchows Arch; 2022 May; 480(5):1023-1030. PubMed ID: 35226147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
    Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.
    Crespo J; Sun H; Wu J; Ding QQ; Tang G; Robinson MK; Chen H; Sahin AA; Lim B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241775. PubMed ID: 33180796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
    Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
    Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HER2-low and Overexpression in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of ASCO/CAP and ToGA Immunohistochemical Scoring.
    Han R; Madariaga A; Gonzalez-Ochoa E; Smith AC; Wang L; Lheureux S; Rouzbahman M
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2024 May; 43(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 38436360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the HER2 status in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer on the basis of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline update.
    Chao WR; Lee MY; Lin WL; Koo CL; Sheu GT; Han CP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Sep; 38(9):1227-34. PubMed ID: 25133707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the 2013 ASCO-CAP HER2 Testing Guideline on the Management of IHC/HER2 2+ Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Yamada M; Kubo M; Yamamoto H; Yamashita N; Kai M; Zaguirre K; Kaneshiro K; Shimazaki A; Hayashi S; Kawaji H; Mori M; Oda Y; Nakamura M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Aug; 41(8):4143-4149. PubMed ID: 34281885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?
    Curado M; Caramelo AS; Eloy C; Polónia A
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 30953146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study.
    Baez-Navarro X; van Bockstal MR; Nawawi D; Broeckx G; Colpaert C; Doebar SC; Hogenes MCH; Koop E; Lambein K; Peeters DJE; Sinke RHJA; Bastiaan van Brakel J; van der Starre-Gaal J; van der Vegt B; van de Vijver K; Vreuls CPH; Vreuls W; Westenend PJ; van Deurzen CHM
    Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100009. PubMed ID: 36788064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A qualitative study comparing the assay performance characteristics between the 2007 and the 2013 American Society for Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists HER2 scoring methods in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Chen CK; Lee MY; Lin WL; Wang YT; Han CP; Yu CP; Chao WR
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Dec; 93(27):e171. PubMed ID: 25501060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
    Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Focused Update.
    Gordian-Arroyo AM; Zynger DL; Tozbikian GH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 152(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 30958889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.
    Muller KE; Marotti JD; Memoli VA; Wells WA; Tafe LJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Aug; 144(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 26185309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
    Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
    Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
    Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HER2/ ERBB2 Immunohistochemical Expression and Copy Number Status in Ovarian Mucinous Tumors.
    Smithgall MC; Yemelyanova A; Mathew S; Gogineni S; He B; Zhang T; Robinson BD; Tu JJ
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2024 Mar; 43(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 37406458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.