BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35227093)

  • 1. The outcome of subsequent revisions after primary total hip arthroplasty in 1,049 patients aged under 50 years : a single-centre cohort study with a follow-up of more than 30 years.
    Kuijpers MFL; Colo E; Schmitz MWJL; Hannink G; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Mar; 104-B(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
    Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thirty years of experience with instrumented femoral impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem : a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties performed between 1991 and 2007.
    Özdemir E; Kuijpers MFL; Visser J; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Sep; 104-B(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 36047023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
    Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
    de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?
    Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Lachiewicz PF; Ryan SP; Wellman SS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiolucent lines do not affect the longevity of highly cross-linked polyethylene cemented components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Takaoka Y; Goto K; Tamura J; Okuzu Y; Kawai T; Kuroda Y; Orita K; Matsuda S
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Oct; 103-B(10):1604-1610. PubMed ID: 34587810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
    Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions.
    Schmitz MW; Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Hendriks JC; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():37. PubMed ID: 23339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty.
    Kostensalo I; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Mokka J; Koivisto M; Mäkelä KT
    Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
    Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of cemented acetabular component geometry on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study of 224,874 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry.
    Divecha HM; O'Neill TW; Lunt M; Board TN
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Nov; 103-B(11):1669-1677. PubMed ID: 34719277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
    Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A significant change towards cemented fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years in the Netherlands: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 28,516 primary hip replacements and 1285 revision procedures.
    Kuijpers MF; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):288-297. PubMed ID: 34102901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.
    Garcia-Rey E; Saldaña L; Garcia-Cimbrelo E
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Mar; 103-B(3):492-499. PubMed ID: 33641418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The outcome of femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem: A prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of ten years.
    te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 26033056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years.
    Attinger MC; Haefeli PC; Bäcker HC; Flueckiger R; Ballmer PM; Siebenrock KA; Klenke FM
    Int Orthop; 2019 Dec; 43(12):2697-2705. PubMed ID: 30663000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.