295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35227444)
1. Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations Focused on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: The Tortoise and the Cheetah.
Voets MM; Veltman J; Slump CH; Siesling S; Koffijberg H
Value Health; 2022 Mar; 25(3):340-349. PubMed ID: 35227444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluations of artificial intelligence-based healthcare interventions: a systematic literature review of best practices in their conduct and reporting.
Vithlani J; Hawksworth C; Elvidge J; Ayiku L; Dawoud D
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1220950. PubMed ID: 37693892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are current clinical studies on artificial intelligence-based medical devices comprehensive enough to support a full health technology assessment? A systematic review.
Farah L; Davaze-Schneider J; Martin T; Nguyen P; Borget I; Martelli N
Artif Intell Med; 2023 Jun; 140():102547. PubMed ID: 37210155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Economic Value of Clinical Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.
Hendrix N; Veenstra DL; Cheng M; Anderson NC; Verguet S
Value Health; 2022 Mar; 25(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 35227443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region.
Augustovski F; Iglesias C; Manca A; Drummond M; Rubinstein A; Martà SG
Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(11):919-29. PubMed ID: 19888792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Economic Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.
Wolff J; Pauling J; Keck A; Baumbach J
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e16866. PubMed ID: 32130134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic Evaluations and Equity in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging Exams for Medical Diagnosis in People With Skin, Neurological, and Pulmonary Diseases: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
Santana GO; Couto RM; Loureiro RM; Furriel BCRS; Rother ET; de Paiva JPQ; Correia LR
JMIR Res Protoc; 2023 Dec; 12():e48544. PubMed ID: 38153775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Review of Health Economic Impact Evaluations of Risk Prediction Models: Stop Developing, Start Evaluating.
van Giessen A; Peters J; Wilcher B; Hyde C; Moons C; de Wit A; Koffijberg E
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 28408017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Artificial Intelligence the Cost-Saving Lens to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
Rizvi A; Rizvi F; Lalakia P; Hyman L; Frasso R; Sztandera L; Das AV
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45539. PubMed ID: 37868419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic review of reporting quality of economic evaluations in plastic surgery based on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
Miroshnychenko A; Uhlman K; Malone J; Waltho D; Thoma A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2458-2466. PubMed ID: 34217645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of the economic evaluations of novel therapeutic agents in multiple myeloma: what is the reporting quality?
Aguiar PM; Lima TM; Storpirtis S
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2016 Apr; 41(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 27009796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the quality and trend of reporting of health economic evaluation research in India.
Karekar S; Shetty Y
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):595-599. PubMed ID: 33249942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of study reporting guidelines for clinical studies using artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Shelmerdine SC; Arthurs OJ; Denniston A; Sebire NJ
BMJ Health Care Inform; 2021 Aug; 28(1):. PubMed ID: 34426417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Augustovski F; de Bekker-Grob E; Briggs AH; Carswell C; Caulley L; Chaiyakunapruk N; Greenberg D; Loder E; Mauskopf J; Mullins CD; Petrou S; Pwu RF; Staniszewska S;
BMJ; 2022 Jan; 376():e067975. PubMed ID: 35017145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality Assessment of Reporting of Economic Evaluation in Cardiac Sugery: Has it Improved?
Guerre P; Laaboub N; Colin C; Obadia JF; Julien C; Hrifach A; Rabier H; Serrier H; Grinberg D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 30744730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suitability of the Current Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Scoping Literature Review.
Farah L; Borget I; Martelli N; Vallee A
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e51514. PubMed ID: 38739911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.
Williams I; McIver S; Moore D; Bryan S
Health Technol Assess; 2008 Apr; 12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. PubMed ID: 18373906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
