BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35227458)

  • 1. Investigating 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Values Based on Preferences of Patients With Heart Disease.
    Gandhi M; Tan RS; Lim SL; Rand K; Lam CSP; Luo N; Cheung YB
    Value Health; 2022 Mar; 25(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 35227458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
    Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
    Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study in Egypt.
    Al Shabasy S; Abbassi M; Finch A; Roudijk B; Baines D; Farid S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Apr; 40(4):433-447. PubMed ID: 34786590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada.
    Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Johnson JA;
    Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 26492214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
    Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
    Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
    Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Wong CKH; Cheung PWH; Samartzis D; Luk KD; Cheung KMC; Lam CLK; Cheung JPY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175847. PubMed ID: 28414745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.
    Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
    Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: a comparison of seven Asian populations.
    Wang P; Liu GG; Jo MW; Purba FD; Yang Z; Gandhi M; Pattanaphesaj J; Ahn J; Wong EL; Shafie AA; Busschbach JJ; Luo N
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Aug; 19(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 30523723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Less Is More: Cross-Validation Testing of Simplified Nonlinear Regression Model Specifications for EQ-5D-5L Health State Values.
    Rand-Hendriksen K; Ramos-Goñi JM; Augestad LA; Luo N
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 28712624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.
    Welie AG; Gebretekle GB; Stolk E; Mukuria C; Krahn MD; Enquoselassie F; Fenta TG
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Sep; 22():7-14. PubMed ID: 31683254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) to the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in patients undergoing dialysis.
    Yang F; Wong CKH; Luo N; Piercy J; Moon R; Jackson J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Nov; 20(8):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 31338698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
    Ludwig K; Graf von der Schulenburg JM; Greiner W
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jun; 36(6):663-674. PubMed ID: 29460066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
    Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N
    Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Golicki D; Jakubczyk M; Graczyk K; Niewada M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1165-1176. PubMed ID: 31161586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study: The Indian 5-Level Version EQ-5D Value Set.
    Jyani G; Sharma A; Prinja S; Kar SS; Trivedi M; Patro BK; Goyal A; Purba FD; Finch AP; Rajsekar K; Raman S; Stolk E; Kaur M
    Value Health; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1218-1226. PubMed ID: 35779943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
    Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan.
    Lin HW; Li CI; Lin FJ; Chang JY; Gau CS; Luo N; Pickard AS; Ramos Goñi JM; Tang CH; Hsu CN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209344. PubMed ID: 30586400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.