These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3522863)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations.
    Stampalia LL; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS; Jones DW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jun; 55(6):694-8. PubMed ID: 3522863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations.
    Reel DC; Mitchell RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
    Ahrari F; Nojoomian M; Moosavi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement.
    Eakle WS
    Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB; Roth L
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A; De Luca S; Garberoglio R
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials.
    Oliveira Fde C; Denehy GE; Boyer DB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jul; 115(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 3475370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amalgam restorations: a new approach.
    al-Duwairi Y; Hadj-Hamou R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation.
    Zidan O; Abdel-Keriem U
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 12901995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased fracture resistance of teeth: comparison of five bonded composite resin systems.
    Eakle WS
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Jan; 17(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3515389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations.
    Covey D; Schulein TM; Kohout FJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Feb; 118(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 2918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.