These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3522878)

  • 21. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of casts produced from alginate and hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Sawyer HF; Sandrik JL; Neiman R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1976 Oct; 93(4):806-8. PubMed ID: 1067345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of the time-dependent dimensional stability of eleven elastomeric impression materials.
    Williams PT; Jackson DG; Bergman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 6379155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Disinfection of dental impressions].
    Setz J; Heeg P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 1814718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Elastomeric impression materials: a comparison of accuracy of multiple pours.
    Kumar D; Madihalli AU; Reddy KR; Rastogi N; Pradeep NT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 22186862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linear dimensional changes in elastic impression materials.
    Marcinak CF; Young FA; Draughn RA; Flemming WR
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(7):1152-5. PubMed ID: 6929810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials.
    Henry PJ; Harnist DJ
    Aust Dent J; 1974 Jun; 19(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 4611404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative surface detail reproduction for elastomeric impression materials: Study on reproducibility performance.
    Varvara G; Sinjari B; Bernardi S; Turkyilmaz I; Malvezzi V; Piattelli M; Caputi S
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 33435664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polyether, polysulfide and silicone rubber impression materials. 2: accuracy of silverplated dies.
    Vermilyea SG; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1975 Dec; 57(12):405-10. PubMed ID: 1073921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models.
    Johnson GH; Craig RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 3889281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants.
    Thouati A; Deveaux E; Iost A; Behin P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8814627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.