These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35230156)

  • 1. Trade-offs of Linear Mixed Models in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Wang H; Aragam B; Xing EP
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 35230156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-Wide Association with Uncertainty in the Genetic Similarity Matrix.
    Wang S; Ge S; Sobkowiak B; Wang L; Grandjean L; Colijn C; Elliott LT
    J Comput Biol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 36374242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linkage Disequilibrium and Evaluation of Genome-Wide Association Mapping Models in Tetraploid Potato.
    Sharma SK; MacKenzie K; McLean K; Dale F; Daniels S; Bryan GJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3185-3202. PubMed ID: 30082329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penalized linear mixed models for structured genetic data.
    Reisetter AC; Breheny P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):427-444. PubMed ID: 33998038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid of Restricted and Penalized Maximum Likelihood Method for Efficient Genome-Wide Association Study.
    Ren W; Liang Z; He S; Xiao J
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33138126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matrix sketching framework for linear mixed models in association studies.
    Burch M; Bose A; Dexter G; Parida L; Drineas P
    Genome Res; 2024 Oct; 34(9):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 39231610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the power of GWAS and avoiding confounding from population stratification with PC-Select.
    Tucker G; Price AL; Berger B
    Genetics; 2014 Jul; 197(3):1045-9. PubMed ID: 24788602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of disregarding family structure on genome-wide association analysis of complex diseases in cohorts with simple pedigrees.
    Nazarian A; Arbeev KG; Kulminski AM
    J Appl Genet; 2020 Feb; 61(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 31755004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BGWAS: Bayesian variable selection in linear mixed models with nonlocal priors for genome-wide association studies.
    Williams J; Xu S; Ferreira MAR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 24(1):194. PubMed ID: 37170185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological implementation of mixed linear models in multi-locus genome-wide association studies.
    Wen YJ; Zhang H; Ni YL; Huang B; Zhang J; Feng JY; Wang SB; Dunwell JM; Zhang YM; Wu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jul; 19(4):700-712. PubMed ID: 28158525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GWAS with longitudinal phenotypes: performance of approximate procedures.
    Sikorska K; Montazeri NM; Uitterlinden A; Rivadeneira F; Eilers PH; Lesaffre E
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 25712081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scalable estimator of SNP heritability for biobank-scale data.
    Wu Y; Sankararaman S
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i187-i194. PubMed ID: 29950019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models.
    Chen H; Wang C; Conomos MP; Stilp AM; Li Z; Sofer T; Szpiro AA; Chen W; Brehm JM; Celedón JC; Redline S; Papanicolaou GJ; Thornton TA; Laurie CC; Rice K; Lin X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Apr; 98(4):653-66. PubMed ID: 27018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for population structure and kinship using the linear mixed model: theory and extensions.
    Hoffman GE
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75707. PubMed ID: 24204578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling.
    Onifade M; Roy-Gagnon MH; Parent MÉ; Burkett KM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 35120458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population structure in genetic studies: Confounding factors and mixed models.
    Sul JH; Martin LS; Eskin E
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007309. PubMed ID: 30589851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiplex confounding factor correction for genomic association mapping with squared sparse linear mixed model.
    Wang H; Liu X; Xiao Y; Xu M; Xing EP
    Methods; 2018 Aug; 145():33-40. PubMed ID: 29705210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.