270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35230351)
21. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.
Cantner F; Cacaci C; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 30887188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study.
Cheng CW; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29086467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics.
Guess PC; Att W; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):633-45. PubMed ID: 21176095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term chipping and failure rates of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported metal-ceramic and ceramic fixed dental prostheses: A cohort study.
Rammelsberg P; Meyer A; Lorenzo-Bermejo J; Kappel S; Zenthöfer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 32800577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
Sadowsky SJ
Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.
Naenni N; Bindl A; Sax C; Hämmerle C; Sailer I
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 26234623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years.
Passia N; Chaar MS; Kern M
J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():126-129. PubMed ID: 31150728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors influencing the survival of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic prostheses: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Mecholsky JJ; Clark AE; Jenkins R; Hsu SM; Neal D; Ren F
J Dent; 2020; 103S():100017. PubMed ID: 34059304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Anusavice KJ
Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 22192254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term performance of implant-supported metal-ceramic and all-ceramic single crowns.
Rammelsberg P; Lorenzo Bermejo J; Kappel S; Meyer A; Zenthöfer A
J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Jul; 64(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 31859082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mazza LC; Lemos CAA; Pesqueira AA; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 33745685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
