These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35232083)

  • 1. Speaker discrimination performance for "easy" versus "hard" voices in style-matched and -mismatched speech.
    Afshan A; Kreiman J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1393. PubMed ID: 35232083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.
    Park SJ; Yeung G; Vesselinova N; Kreiman J; Keating PA; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):375. PubMed ID: 30075658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Voice-Based Judgments of Socially Relevant Speaker Traits Differ Across Speech Types?
    Groyecka-Bernard A; Pisanski K; Frąckowiak T; Kobylarek A; Kupczyk P; Oleszkiewicz A; Sabiniewicz A; Wróbel M; Sorokowski P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3674-3694. PubMed ID: 36167068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Burston LFK; Garrido L
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 30221374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Curious Case of Impersonators and Singers: Telling Voices Apart and Telling Voices Together under Naturally Challenging Listening Conditions.
    Stevenage SV; Singh L; Dixey P
    Brain Sci; 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36831901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dogs perceive and spontaneously normalize formant-related speaker and vowel differences in human speech sounds.
    Root-Gutteridge H; Ratcliffe VF; Korzeniowska AT; Reby D
    Biol Lett; 2019 Dec; 15(12):20190555. PubMed ID: 31795850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the acoustics of speaker gender perception: A gender expansive perspective.
    Merritt B; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):484. PubMed ID: 35105035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Jena Speaker Set (JESS)-A database of voice stimuli from unfamiliar young and old adult speakers.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Golle J; Schweinberger SR
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):990-1007. PubMed ID: 31637667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speaker Adaptation on Articulation and Acoustics for Articulation-to-Speech Synthesis.
    Cao B; Wisler A; Wang J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.
    Tzeng CY; Alexander JE; Sidaras SK; Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1793-1805. PubMed ID: 27399829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When speaker identity is unavoidable: Neural processing of speaker identity cues in natural speech.
    Tuninetti A; Chládková K; Peter V; Schiller NO; Escudero P
    Brain Lang; 2017 Nov; 174():42-49. PubMed ID: 28715718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listeners' Perceptions of Speaker Personality Traits Based on Speech.
    Welch B; van Mersbergen MR; Helou LB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4762-4771. PubMed ID: 34731579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaking in the presence of noise: Consistency of acoustic properties in clear-Lombard speech over time.
    Shen C; Cooke M; Janse E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2165. PubMed ID: 37092911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition.
    van Dommelen WA
    Lang Speech; 1990; 33 ( Pt 3)():259-72. PubMed ID: 2093780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.